Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr 12;9(1):1410.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03705-y.

Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics

Affiliations
Review

Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics

Daniel Rosenblum et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Targeted delivery approaches for cancer therapeutics have shown a steep rise over the past few decades. However, compared to the plethora of successful pre-clinical studies, only 15 passively targeted nanocarriers (NCs) have been approved for clinical use and none of the actively targeted NCs have advanced past clinical trials. Herein, we review the principles behind targeted delivery approaches to determine potential reasons for their limited clinical translation and success. We propose criteria and considerations that must be taken into account for the development of novel actively targeted NCs. We also highlight the possible directions for the development of successful tumor targeting strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.P. declares financial interest in Quiet Therapeutics, ART Biosciences, and SEPL pharma. J.M.K. holds equity in Alivio Therapeutics, a company that has an option to license IP generated by J.M.K. and that may benefit financially if the IP is licensed and further validated. The interests of J.M.K were reviewed and are subject to a management plan overseen by his institution in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration of main physiological barriers faced by passive and active targeted NCs. a NCs face endothelial barriers in the process of their extravasation into the tumor tissue; illustration of the blood–brain barrier as an example. b Uptake of NCs by the target cells and their escape from the endo-lysosomal system into the cytotosl are the major cellular barriers. c Hepatic Kupffer cells as an example of mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS), which results in the clearence of systemically administered NCs, reducing their half-life and effective dose
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The impact of nano–bio interactions on the systemically administrated NCs. a During systemic circulation, targeted NCs get coated with serum proteins and opsonins, which impacts the targeting efficiency and many other properties of NCs, including b particle size, c pharmacokinetics, d release profiles, e tissue penetration, f cellular uptake and intrecellular trafficking and g biodistribution (ID injected dose)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic illustration of the proposed workflow in the development of actively targeted NCs
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Challenges to clinical translation of stimuli-responsive NCs. Controlled-switch NCs designed to prevent premature drug release face challenges associated with the type of stimulus on which they are based. Other than that, additional design challenges for the NCs themeselves include scalability, sensitivity, and response to the stimulus, biocompatibility, and toxicity
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Biological and technical barriers to the success of local drug delivery. Local administration is a promising strategy for targeted drug delivery in certain cancers. However, there are still some cancer-specific biological and technical barriers that need to be overcome by the clinical success of this approach

References

    1. Peer D, et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nano. 2007;2:751–760. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilhelm S, et al. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016;1:16014. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14. - DOI
    1. Sadauskas E, et al. Kupffer cells are central in the removal of nanoparticles from the organism. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2007;4:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-4-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanco E, Shen H, Ferrari M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotech. 2015;33:941–951. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3330. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. Nanoparticles in the clinic. Bioeng.Transl. Med. 2016;1:10–29. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms