Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 12;8(1):5882.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24285-3.

Prospective Comparison of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB Assays for Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis

Affiliations

Prospective Comparison of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB Assays for Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis

Fengjiao Du et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) tests, as two commercial blood assays for diagnosing active tuberculosis (ATB), are not yet fully validated. Especially, there are no reports on comparing the efficacy between the two tests in the same population in China. A multicenter, prospective comparison study was undertaken at four hospitals specializing in pulmonary diseases. A total of 746 suspected pulmonary TB were enrolled and categorized, including 185 confirmed TB, 298 probable TB and 263 non-TB. Of 32 patients with indeterminate test results (ITRs), age and underlying disease were associated with the rate of ITRs. Furthermore, the rate of ITRs determined by T-SPOT.TB was lower than QFT-GIT (0.4% vs. 4.3%, P < 0.01). When excluding ITRs, the sensitivities of T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT were 85.2% and 84.8%, and specificities of 63.4% and 60.5%, respectively in the diagnosis of ATB. The two assays have an overall agreement of 92.3%, but exhibited a poor linear correlation (r2 = 0.086) between the levels of interferon-γ release detected by the different assays. Although having some heterogeneity in detecting interferon-γ release, both the QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB demonstrated high concordance in diagnosing ATB. However, neither of them showed suitability in the definitive diagnosis of the disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study population. Of the 827 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis recruited, 746 were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. TB, tuberculosis. CT, computed tomography. AFB, acid-fast bacilli. TBLB, transbronchial lung biopsy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots of the SFCs using the T-SPOT.TB assay (A) and the amounts of released interferon-γ using the QFT-GIT (B) assay in the confirmed TB, probable TB and non-TB groups, respectively. The groups were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. SFCs, spot forming cells. PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells. TB, tuberculosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association between the number of SFCs (spot-forming cells) (TB Ag – Nil) in the T-SPOT.TB assay and the amounts of released interferon-γ (TB Ag – Nil) in the QFT-GIT assay among 746 patients. Regression analysis were demonstrated by linear correlation (r2).

References

    1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis control. 2016. Available at: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/ (2016).
    1. Wang L, Liu J, Chin DP. Progress in tuberculosis control and the evolving public-health system in China. Lancet. 2007;369:691–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60316-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li Y, et al. Factors associated with patient, and diagnostic delays in Chinese TB patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC. Med. 2013;11:156. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-156. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brodie D, Schluger NW. The diagnosis of tuberculosis. Clin. Chest. Med. 2005;26:247–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2005.02.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lalvani A, Pareek M. Interferon gamma release assays: principles and practice. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2010;28:245–52. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2009.05.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources