Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;36(7):809-822.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0641-6.

Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy and Pharmacoeconomic Impact of Rifaximin

Affiliations

Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy and Pharmacoeconomic Impact of Rifaximin

Guy Neff et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jul.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a common neurologic complication in cirrhosis, is associated with substantial disease and economic burden. Rifaximin is a non-systemic antibiotic that reduces the risk of overt HE recurrence and overt HE-related hospitalizations.

Objective: Our objective was to provide an overview of the direct HE-related costs and cost benefits of rifaximin, lactulose, and rifaximin plus lactulose.

Methods: A systematic review of PubMed and relevant meeting abstracts was conducted to identify publications since 1 January 2007 reporting economic data related to HE and rifaximin and/or lactulose. Further, a public database and published literature were used to estimate current costs of hospitalization for overt HE, and potential cost savings of HE-related hospitalizations with rifaximin. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Drummond checklist.

Results: A total of 16 reports were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. Globally, HE-related direct costs ranged from $US5370 to $US50,120 annually per patient. Rifaximin was associated with shorter hospital stays and reduced healthcare costs. Rifaximin also has the potential to reduce overt HE-related hospitalization risk by 50% compared with lactulose. Rifaximin was shown to have a favourable pharmacoeconomic profile compared with lactulose (based on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio).

Conclusions: In addition to its clinical benefits (e.g. reduction in the risk of recurrence of overt HE, overt HE-related hospitalizations, favourable adverse event profile), economic data are favourable for the use of rifaximin in patients with a history of overt HE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

Technical editorial assistance was provided, under the direction of the authors, by Mary Beth Moncrief, PhD, and Sophie Bolick, PhD, Synchrony Medical Communications, LLC, West Chester, PA, USA. Funding for this support was provided by Salix Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Conflict of interest

GN and WZ have no potential conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this article and neither they nor their respective institutions received funding for the manuscript. Salix Pharmaceuticals did not actively participate in content development but reviewed the manuscript for scientific accuracy. As disclosed in the funding statement, Salix Pharmaceuticals provided support for technical editorial assistance.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram detailing the search for records pertaining to economic data for hepatic encephalopathy, and administration of rifaximin and/or lactulose. Search terms included hepatic encephalopathy, economic, health-related quality of life, cost, cost utility, cost effectiveness, rifaximin, lactulose adherence, and patient-reported outcomes. HE hepatic encephalopathy

References

    1. Vilstrup H, Amodio P, Bajaj J, Cordoba J, Ferenci P, Mullen KD, et al. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. Hepatology. 2014;60(2):715–735. doi: 10.1002/hep.27210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romero-Gómez M, Boza F, García-Valdecasas MS, García E, Aguilar-Reina J. Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy predicts the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(9):2718–2723. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04130.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patidar KR, Bajaj JS. Covert and overt hepatic encephalopathy: diagnosis and management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(12):2048–2061. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bajaj JS, Wade JB, Sanyal AJ. Spectrum of neurocognitive impairment in cirrhosis: implications for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 2009;50(6):2014–2021. doi: 10.1002/hep.23216. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bajaj JS, Riggio O, Allampati S, Prakash R, Gioia S, Onori E, et al. Cognitive dysfunction is associated with poor socioeconomic status in patients with cirrhosis: an international multicenter study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(11):1511–1516. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms