The effectiveness of therapeutic strategies for patients with radiculopathy: A network meta-analysis
- PMID: 29651898
- PMCID: PMC5900815
- DOI: 10.1177/1744806918768972
The effectiveness of therapeutic strategies for patients with radiculopathy: A network meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this network meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies for patients with radiculopathy, including physical, medical, surgical, and other therapies. Methods We electronically searched electronic databases including PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials. The response rate and visual analog scale of pain change were considered as primary outcomes. The outcomes were measured by odds ratio (OR) value and corresponding 95% credible intervals (CrIs) or standardized mean difference (MD) with 95% CrIs. Besides, surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were performed to rank efficacy and safety of treatments on each end points. Results A total of 16 eligible studies with 1071 subjects were included in this analysis. Our results showed that corticosteroid was significantly more effective than control regarding the response rate (OR = 3.86, 95% CrI: 1.16, 12.55). Surgery had a better performance in pain change compared with control (MD = -1.92, 95% CrI: -3.58, -0.15). According to the SUCRA results, corticosteroid, collar, and physiotherapy ranked the highest concerning response rate (SUCRA = 0.656, 0.652, and 0.610, respectively). Surgery, traction, and corticosteroid were superior to others in pain change (SUCRA = 0.866, 0.748, and 0.589, respectively). Conclusion According to the network meta-analysis result, we recommended surgery as the optimal treatment for radiculopathy patients; traction and corticosteroids were also recommended for their beneficial interventions.
Keywords: Radiculopathy; network meta-analysis; pain change; response rate; treatment.
Figures
References
-
- Corey DL andComeau D.. Cervical radiculopathy. The Medical clinics of North America 2014; 98: 791–799, xii. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.04.001. - PubMed
-
- DeFroda SF Daniels AH andDeren ME.. Differentiating Radiculopathy from Lower Extremity Arthropathy. The American Journal of Medicine 2016; 129: 1124 e1121–1127. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.06.019. - PubMed
-
- Kreiner DS, Hwang SW, Easa JE, Resnick DK, Baisden JL, Bess S, Cho CH, DePalma MJ, Dougherty P, 2nd, Fernand R, Ghiselli G, Hanna AS, Lamer T, Lisi AJ, Mazanec DJ, Meagher RJ, Nucci RC, Patel RD, Sembrano JN, Sharma AK, Summers JT, Taleghani CK, Tontz WL, Jr., Toton JF. and North American Spine S. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society 2014; 14: 180–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.003. - PubMed
-
- Cho N Keith J andPirouzmand F.. Lumbar discal cyst as a cause of radiculopathy: case report. British Journal of Neurosurgery 2016; 30: 675–677. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1100274. - PubMed
-
- Gunduz OH Sencan S andKokar S.. A rare cause of lumbar radiculopathy: perineural cyst. Pain Medicine 2015; 16: 199–200. DOI: 10.1111/pme.12560. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
