Evaluation of kinetic friction between regular and colored titanium molybdenum alloy archwires
- PMID: 29652017
- DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_817_16
Evaluation of kinetic friction between regular and colored titanium molybdenum alloy archwires
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the kinetic frictional properties of colored titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) archwires (purple-coated TMA and honey dew-coated TMA) and the regular TMA archwires.
Materials and methods: The experiment comprised of three groups, Group I - Regular TMA archwires, Group II - Purple-coated TMA archwires, Group III - Honey dew-coated TMA wires involving 21 samples each that were evaluated for their frictional properties using Instron Universal Testing Machine.
Results: The results were subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance wherein Group I Regular TMA wires revealed mean kinetic frictional value of 8.236 N and a standard deviation of 0.4038 N, while Group II (purple-coated TMA wires) showed a mean value of 5.297 N, standard deviation of 0.3128 N and Group III (honey dew-coated TMA wires) showed a mean value of 4.206 N and a standard deviation of 0.5353 N.
Conclusion: The kinetic frictional values are higher for regular TMA wire exhibiting superior characteristic of color-coated TMA. Wires exhibiting superior characteristics are color-coated TMA wires, especially honey dew-coated TMA wires over the regular and purple-coated TMA wires. These superior properties of newly introduced wires can be considered for its application in both details friction and frictionless mechanics in retraction phase of fixed orthodontic treatment.
Keywords: Honey dew titanium molybdenum alloy wires; Instron Universal Testing Machine; kinetic friction; purple titanium molybdenum alloy wires; titanium molybdenum alloy wires.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest
Similar articles
-
Evaluation and comparison of surface characteristics of commercially available TMA wires using scanning electron microscopy and optical profilometer.Indian J Dent Res. 2019 Jul-Aug;30(4):548-552. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_420_18. Indian J Dent Res. 2019. PMID: 31745051
-
A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets.Eur J Orthod. 2004 Feb;26(1):105-11. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.1.105. Eur J Orthod. 2004. PMID: 14994890
-
Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires : An in vitro study.J Orofac Orthop. 2021 Jul;82(4):218-225. doi: 10.1007/s00056-020-00266-y. Epub 2020 Dec 2. J Orofac Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33263771 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Features and Physical Properties of Gummetal Orthodontic Wire in Comparison with Dissimilar Archwires: A Critical Review.Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 28;2021:6611979. doi: 10.1155/2021/6611979. eCollection 2021. Biomed Res Int. 2021. PMID: 33575329 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent Advances in Orthodontic Archwires: A Review.Cureus. 2023 Oct 25;15(10):e47633. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47633. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38022289 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of anodization on friction behavior of β‑titanium orthodontic archwires.J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Jul;84(4):225-234. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00347-6. Epub 2021 Sep 17. J Orofac Orthop. 2023. PMID: 34533584 English.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources