Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr-Jun;21(2):181-184.
doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_170_17.

Indications and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal life support in clermont-ferrand

Affiliations

Indications and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal life support in clermont-ferrand

Abdel-Kémal Bori Bata et al. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To report the epidemiological profile of the patients who underwent extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and then analyze the indications and outcomes of this procedure.

Methods: It consisted of a retrospective and descriptive study based on the database from the department of cardiovascular surgery.

Setting: University hospital clinic.

Patients: One hundred and sixty-one patients have participated in the study. Included were all patients who presented with left-sided heart or biventricular failure. Those who were suffering from either isolate respiratory failure or isolate right ventricle failure were excluded.

Interventions: Participants underwent ECLS: central ECLS or peripheral ECLS.

Results: : The mean age of the patients was 54 years; there were 73% of male patients and the mean duration of ECLS was 5.3 days. There were two types of ECLS: central (71%) and peripheral (29%). Indications for support were dominated by cardiogenic shock in 69%. Bleeding was the most frequent complication (23.5%). The overall in-hospital mortality of patients who underwent ECLS was 60%.

Conclusion: The number of ECLS performed increases in proportion to mastery of surgical technique. There is a high rate of mortality and morbidity with ECLS. However, it remains a lifesaving therapy for many clinically urgent situations.

Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; cardiorespiratory support; extracorporeal life support; ventricular failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of performed extracorporeal life support per year from 2005 to 2014
Figure 2
Figure 2
Perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal life support

References

    1. Johnson NJ, Acker M, Hsu CH, Desai N, Vallabhajosyula P, Lazar S, et al. Extracorporeal life support as rescue strategy for out-of-hospital and emergency department cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1527–32. - PubMed
    1. Lunz D, Philipp A, Dolch M, Born F, Zausig YA. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Indications, limitations and practical implementation. Anaesthesist. 2014;63:625–35. - PubMed
    1. Makdisi G, Wang IW. Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) review of a lifesaving technology. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:E166–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Extracorporeal Life Support Registry Report. [Last accessed on 2017 May 24]. Available from: https://www.elso.org/Registry/Statistics/InternationalSummary.aspx .
    1. Park SJ, Kim JB, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Lee JW, et al. Outcomes of extracorporeal life support for low cardiac output syndrome after major cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:283–9. - PubMed

MeSH terms