The Impact of an Integrated Program of Return-to-Field and Targeted Trap-Neuter-Return on Feline Intake and Euthanasia at a Municipal Animal Shelter
- PMID: 29652808
- PMCID: PMC5946139
- DOI: 10.3390/ani8040055
The Impact of an Integrated Program of Return-to-Field and Targeted Trap-Neuter-Return on Feline Intake and Euthanasia at a Municipal Animal Shelter
Abstract
Available evidence indicates that overall levels of feline intake and euthanasia at U.S. shelters have significantly declined in recent decades. Nevertheless, millions of cats, many of them free-roaming, continue to be admitted to shelters each year. In some locations, as many as 70% of cats, perhaps up to one million or more per year nationally, are euthanized. New approaches, including return-to-field (RTF) and targeted trap-neuter-return (TNR) appear to have transformative potential. The purpose of the present study was to examine changes in feline intake and euthanasia, as well as additional associated metrics, at a municipal animal shelter in Albuquerque, New Mexico, after institutionalized RTF and targeted TNR protocols, together referred to as a community cat program (CCP), were added to ongoing community-based TNR efforts and a pilot RTF initiative. Over the course of the CCP, which ran from April 2012 to March 2015, 11,746 cats were trapped, sterilized, vaccinated, and returned or adopted. Feline euthanasia at the Albuquerque Animal Welfare Department (AAWD) declined by 84.1% and feline intake dropped by 37.6% over three years; the live release rate (LRR) increased by 47.7% due primarily to these reductions in both intake and euthanasia. Modest increases in the percentage of cats returned to owner (RTO) and the adoption rate were also observed, although both metrics decreased on an absolute basis, while the number of calls to the city about dead cats declined.
Keywords: community cat program (CCP); feline euthanasia; feline intake; feral cats; live release rate (LRR); municipal animal shelter; return-to-field (RTF); targeted TNR; trap-neuter-return (TNR).
Conflict of interest statement
In recognition of MDPI policy and our ethical obligations as researchers, the authors acknowledge that the funding sponsors provided general guidance for the design of the study and were periodically apprised of project status during data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and the writing of the manuscript.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The Impact of Return-to-Field and Targeted Trap-Neuter-Return on Feline Intake and Euthanasia at a Municipal Animal Shelter in Jefferson County, Kentucky.Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 11;10(8):1395. doi: 10.3390/ani10081395. Animals (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32796681 Free PMC article.
-
Integrated Return-To-Field and Targeted Trap-Neuter-Vaccinate-Return Programs Result in Reductions of Feline Intake and Euthanasia at Six Municipal Animal Shelters.Front Vet Sci. 2019 Mar 21;6:77. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00077. eCollection 2019. Front Vet Sci. 2019. PMID: 30949486 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of high-impact targeted trap-neuter-return and adoption of community cats on cat intake to a shelter.Vet J. 2014 Sep;201(3):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 5. Vet J. 2014. PMID: 24980808
-
A Case of Letting the Cat out of The Bag-Why Trap-Neuter-Return Is Not an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat (Felis catus) Management.Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;9(4):171. doi: 10.3390/ani9040171. Animals (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30995809 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rethinking the Animal Shelter's Role in Free-Roaming Cat Management.Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 8;9:847081. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.847081. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2022. PMID: 35372561 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Targeted Trap-Neuter-Return Efforts in the San Francisco Bay Area.Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 11;10(11):2089. doi: 10.3390/ani10112089. Animals (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33187180 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking Urban Cat Management-Limitations and Unintended Consequences of Traditional Cat Management.Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;15(7):1005. doi: 10.3390/ani15071005. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40218398 Free PMC article.
-
Urban Cat Management in Australia-Evidence-Based Strategies for Success.Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;15(8):1083. doi: 10.3390/ani15081083. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40281917 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Lethal, Enforcement-Centred Cat Management on Human Wellbeing: Exploring Lived Experiences of Cat Carers Affected by Cat Culling at the Port of Newcastle.Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;13(2):271. doi: 10.3390/ani13020271. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36670811 Free PMC article.
-
Public Opinions on Strategies for Managing Stray Cats and Predictors of Opposition to Trap-Neuter and Return in Brisbane, Australia.Front Vet Sci. 2019 Feb 18;5:290. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00290. eCollection 2018. Front Vet Sci. 2019. PMID: 30834249 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Clancy E.A., Rowan A.N. Companion Animal Demographics in the United States: A Historical Perspective. In: Salem D.J., Rowan A.N., editors. The state of the animals II. Humane Society Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2003. pp. 9–26.
-
- Rowan A.N. 2013 National Council on Pet Population Research Symposium Presentations: CATS: The Ins and Outs: Improving their Future Through Research. Society of Animal Welfare Administrators; Tempe, AZ, USA: 2013. Cat demographic analyses in the USA.
-
- Cicirelli J. The Outdoor Cat: Science and Policy from a Global Perspective. The Humane Society Institute for Science and Policy; Marina del Ray, CA, USA: 2012. Managing Shelter Cat-astrophe.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous