Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):55.
doi: 10.3390/ani8040055.

The Impact of an Integrated Program of Return-to-Field and Targeted Trap-Neuter-Return on Feline Intake and Euthanasia at a Municipal Animal Shelter

Daniel D Spehar  1 , Peter J Wolf  2
Affiliations

The Impact of an Integrated Program of Return-to-Field and Targeted Trap-Neuter-Return on Feline Intake and Euthanasia at a Municipal Animal Shelter

Daniel D Spehar et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Available evidence indicates that overall levels of feline intake and euthanasia at U.S. shelters have significantly declined in recent decades. Nevertheless, millions of cats, many of them free-roaming, continue to be admitted to shelters each year. In some locations, as many as 70% of cats, perhaps up to one million or more per year nationally, are euthanized. New approaches, including return-to-field (RTF) and targeted trap-neuter-return (TNR) appear to have transformative potential. The purpose of the present study was to examine changes in feline intake and euthanasia, as well as additional associated metrics, at a municipal animal shelter in Albuquerque, New Mexico, after institutionalized RTF and targeted TNR protocols, together referred to as a community cat program (CCP), were added to ongoing community-based TNR efforts and a pilot RTF initiative. Over the course of the CCP, which ran from April 2012 to March 2015, 11,746 cats were trapped, sterilized, vaccinated, and returned or adopted. Feline euthanasia at the Albuquerque Animal Welfare Department (AAWD) declined by 84.1% and feline intake dropped by 37.6% over three years; the live release rate (LRR) increased by 47.7% due primarily to these reductions in both intake and euthanasia. Modest increases in the percentage of cats returned to owner (RTO) and the adoption rate were also observed, although both metrics decreased on an absolute basis, while the number of calls to the city about dead cats declined.

Keywords: community cat program (CCP); feline euthanasia; feline intake; feral cats; live release rate (LRR); municipal animal shelter; return-to-field (RTF); targeted TNR; trap-neuter-return (TNR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

In recognition of MDPI policy and our ethical obligations as researchers, the authors acknowledge that the funding sponsors provided general guidance for the design of the study and were periodically apprised of project status during data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and the writing of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Feline intake, euthanasia, and surgeries: Albuquerque community cat program (CCP).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Annual feline intake and euthanasia at Albuquerque Animal Welfare Department, 2007–2017.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sterilization surgeries in zip codes targeted by CCP and Animal Humane New Mexico (AHNM).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Descriptive statistics (minimum, maximum, median, first and third quartiles) illustrating the impact of “Red-Flag Cat Model” for each program year. For each cat originating as a “shelter intake,” additional “field-origin” cats from the same location were often trapped, sterilized, vaccinated, and returned.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clancy E.A., Rowan A.N. Companion Animal Demographics in the United States: A Historical Perspective. In: Salem D.J., Rowan A.N., editors. The state of the animals II. Humane Society Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2003. pp. 9–26.
    1. Rowan A.N. 2013 National Council on Pet Population Research Symposium Presentations: CATS: The Ins and Outs: Improving their Future Through Research. Society of Animal Welfare Administrators; Tempe, AZ, USA: 2013. Cat demographic analyses in the USA.
    1. Zawistowkski S., Morris J., Salman M.D., Ruch-Gallie R. Population Dynamics, Overpopulation, and the Welfare of Companion Animals: New Insights on Old and New Data. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 1998;1:193–206. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0103_1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartlett P.C., Bartlett A., Walshaw S., Halstead S. Rates of Euthanasia and Adoption for Dogs and Cats in Michigan Animal Shelters. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2005;8:97–104. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0802_2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cicirelli J. The Outdoor Cat: Science and Policy from a Global Perspective. The Humane Society Institute for Science and Policy; Marina del Ray, CA, USA: 2012. Managing Shelter Cat-astrophe.

LinkOut - more resources