Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 13;13(4):e0196007.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196007. eCollection 2018.

Assessment of costs associated with adverse events in patients with cancer

Affiliations

Assessment of costs associated with adverse events in patients with cancer

William Wong et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Adverse event (AE)-related costs represent an important component of economic models for cancer care. However, since previous studies mostly focused on specific AEs, treatments, or cancer types, limited information is currently available. Therefore, this study assessed the incremental healthcare costs associated with a large number of AEs among patients diagnosed with some of the most prevalent types of cancer. Data were obtained from a large US claims database. Adult patients were included if diagnosed with and treated for one of the following cancer types: breast, digestive organs and peritoneum, genitourinary organs (including bladder and ovary and other uterine adnexa), lung, lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue, and skin. Treatment episodes were defined as the period from initiation of the first antineoplastic pharmacologic therapy to discontinuation (i.e., gap of ≥ 45 days), or change in treatment regimen, or end of data availability. A total of 36 AEs were selected from the product inserts of 104 treatments recommended by practice guidelines. A retrospective matched cohort design was used, matching a treatment episode with a certain AE with a treatment episode without that AE. A total of 412,005 patients were selected, for a total of 794,243 treatment episodes, resulting in 1,617,368 matched treatment episodes across all 36 AEs. Incremental healthcare costs associated with AEs of any severity ranged from $546 for cough/upper respiratory infections to $24,633 for gastrointestinal perforation. The three most costly AEs when considering any severity were gastrointestinal perforation ($24,633), central nervous system hemorrhage ($24,322), and sepsis/septicemia ($23,510). Incremental healthcare costs associated with severe AEs ranged from $15,709 for dermatitis and rash to $48,538 for gastrointestinal fistula. The three most costly severe AEs were gastrointestinal fistula ($48,538), gastrointestinal perforation ($41,281), and central nervous system hemorrhage ($38,428). In conclusion, AEs during treatment episodes for cancer were frequent and associated with a substantial economic burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: YMY and WW are employees of Genentech, Inc., and may own Genentech, Inc. stock or stock options. AK was an intern at Genentech, Inc. at the time the study was conducted and is currently a contractor for Genentech Inc.; she may own Genentech, Inc. stock or stock options. MC, MGL, PGS, and AG are employees of Analysis Group, Inc., which has received consulting fees from Genentech, Inc., for this study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Patient selection.
NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, HSCT: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, DRG: Diagnosis-Related Group.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Study design.
AE: adverse events.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Incremental costs per treatment episode—AEs of any severity.
AE: adverse events; 95% confidence intervals are presented in parentheses.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Incremental costs per treatment episode—severe AEs.
AE: adverse events; 95% confidence intervals are presented in parentheses.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Increment costs of AEs, by cancer type.
AE: adverse events.

References

    1. Schnipper LE, Davidson NE, Wollins DS, Tyne C, Blayney DW, Blum D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2563–2577. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6706 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schnipper LE, Bastian A. New Frameworks to Assess Value of Cancer Care: Strengths and Limitations. Oncologist. 2016;21:654–658. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0177 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weycker D, Danel A, Marciniak A, Bendall K, Lipsitz M, Pettengell R. Economic costs of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in European and Australian clinical practice. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:362–374. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-362 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pike CT, Birnbaum HG, Muehlenbein CE, Pohl GM, Natale RB. Healthcare costs and workloss burden of patients with chemotherapy-associated peripheral neuropathy in breast, ovarian, head and neck, and nonsmall cell lung cancer. Chemother Res Pract. 2012;2012:913848 doi: 10.1155/2012/913848 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Latremouille-Viau D, Chang J, Guerin A, Shi S, Wang E, Yu J, et al. The economic burden of common adverse events associated with metastatic colorectal cancer treatment in the United States. J Med Econ. 2017;20:54–62. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1225577 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types