What is the quality of the maternal near-miss case reviews in WHO European Region? Cross-sectional study in Armenia, Georgia, Latvia, Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan
- PMID: 29654004
- PMCID: PMC5898291
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017696
What is the quality of the maternal near-miss case reviews in WHO European Region? Cross-sectional study in Armenia, Georgia, Latvia, Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan
Abstract
Objectives: The maternal near-miss case review (NMCR) cycle is a type of clinical audit aiming at improving quality of maternal healthcare by discussing near-miss cases. In several countries this approach has been introduced and supported by WHO and partners since 2004, but information on the quality of its implementation is missing. This study aimed at evaluating the quality of the NMCR implementation in selected countries within WHO European Region.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Settings: Twenty-three maternity units in Armenia, Georgia, Latvia, Moldova and Uzbekistan.
Assessment tools: A predefined checklist including 50 items, according to WHO methodology. Quality in the NMCR implementation was defined by summary scores ranging from 0 (totally inappropriate) to 3 (appropriate).
Results: Quality of the NMCR implementation was heterogeneous among different countries, and within the same country. Overall, the first part of the audit cycle (from case identification to case analysis) was fairly well performed (mean score 2.00, 95% CI 1.94 to 2.06), with the exception of the 'inclusion of users' views' (mean score 0.66, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.22), while the second part (developing recommendations, implementing them and ensuring quality) was poorly performed (mean score 0.66, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.22). Each country had at least one champion facility, where quality of the NMCR cycle was acceptable. Quality of the implementation was not associated with its duration. Gaps in implementation were of technical, organisational and attitudinal nature.
Conclusions: Ensuring quality in the NMCR may be difficult but achievable. The high heterogeneity in results within the same country suggests that quality of the NMCR implementation depends, to a large extent, from hospital factors, including staff's commitment, managerial support and local coordination. Efforts should be put in preventing and mitigating common barriers that hamper successful NMCR implementation.
Keywords: maternal health; middle-income countries; near-miss case review; quality of care; standard-based assessment.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescent’s Health 2016-2030. http://www.who.int/life-course/partners/global-strategy/global-strategy-... (accessed 15 Dec 2016). - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization (WHO), Regional Office for Europe. Health 2020: the European policy for health and well-being. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013.
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014.
-
- World Health Organization. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical