Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr 15;78(8):1898-1903.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3043.

The Plausibility of Obesity Paradox in Cancer-Point

Affiliations
Review

The Plausibility of Obesity Paradox in Cancer-Point

Yikyung Park et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

In contrast to the convincing evidence that obesity (measured by body mass index, BMI) increases the risk of many different types of cancer, there is an ambiguity in the role of obesity in survival among cancer patients. Some studies suggested that higher BMI decreased mortality risk in cancer patients, a phenomenon called the obesity paradox. The spurious positive association between BMI and cancer survival is likely to be explained by several methodologic limitations including confounding, reverse causation, and collider stratification bias. Also, the inadequacy of BMI as a measure of body fatness in cancer patients commonly experiencing changes in body weight and body composition may have resulted in the paradox. Other factors contributing to the divergent results in literature are significant heterogeneity in study design and method (e.g., study population, follow-up length); time of BMI assessment (pre-, peri-, or post-diagnosis); and lack of consideration for variability in the strength and directions of associations by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and cancer subtype. Robust but practical methods to accurately assess body fatness and body compositions and weight trajectories in cancer survivors are needed to advance this emerging field and to develop weight guidelines to improve both the length and the quality of cancer survival. Cancer Res; 78(8); 1898-903. ©2018 AACR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: the authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K, et al. Body Fatness and Cancer--Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. The New England journal of medicine. 2016;375:794–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kyrgiou M, Kalliala I, Markozannes G, Gunter MJ, Paraskevaidis E, Gabra H, et al. Adiposity and cancer at major anatomical sites: umbrella review of the literature. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2017;356:j477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park Y, Colditz GA. Fresh evidence links adiposity with multiple cancers. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2017;356:j908. - PubMed
    1. Iyengar NM, Gucalp A, Dannenberg AJ, Hudis CA. Obesity and Cancer Mechanisms: Tumor Microenvironment and Inflammation. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:4270–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renehan AG, Zwahlen M, Egger M. Adiposity and cancer risk: new mechanistic insights from epidemiology. Nature reviews Cancer. 2015;15:484–98. - PubMed

Publication types