Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;149(7):589-598.
doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: A 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study

Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: A 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study

Qiaoling Ma et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The authors evaluated the morphology and symmetry of the temporomandibular joint in participants with normodivergent and hyperdivergent skeletal class I, II, and III patterns.

Methods: A total of 80 participants were divided into 4 groups on the basis of their sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. Cone-beam computed tomographic images were used to evaluate the condyle-fossa relationship and the morphology and symmetry of the mandibular condyle. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests were used to compare the mean values among the different groups.

Results: Participants with class II hyperdivergent patterns had the smallest anteroposterior (mean [standard deviation {SD}], 4.4 [1.6] millimeters) and mediolateral (10.5 [3.0] mm) condylar process widths among all 4 groups. The mean (SD) axial condylar angle was flatter in patients with class III hyperdivergent patterns (19.8° [5.1°]) compared with the other groups. The mean (SD) anteroposterior differences of the condylar processes (2.9 [1.4] mm) in patients with class III hyperdivergent patterns were the greatest in all 4 groups.

Conclusion: Participants in the group with class II hyperdivergent patterns have a smaller and narrower condyle compared with the other groups measured. Asymmetry was found among all groups, with participants with skeletal class III patterns having the most asymmetry. The most common condylar morphology in all groups examined was convex.

Practical implications: These results support the concept that morphology and symmetry of the temporomandibular joint varies in different skeletal patterns, presumably as an adaptive response to functional demands.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; condylar morphology; symmetry; temporomandibular joint.

PubMed Disclaimer