No difference in implant survivorship and clinical outcomes between full-cementless and full-cemented fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 29656129
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.015
No difference in implant survivorship and clinical outcomes between full-cementless and full-cemented fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The debate over the use of cemented or cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has never stopped since cementless fixation was introduced. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the optimal mode of fixation (full-cementless vs. full-cemented) in TKA.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases up to July 2017 were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing full-cementless TKA and full-cemented TKA. The primary outcome was implant survivorship. Secondary outcomes included radiological outcomes (maximum total point-motion [MTPM], radiolucent line, rotation degree) and clinical outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] score, Knee Society Score [KSS] score, postoperative range of movement, blood loss and complications).
Results: Seven studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The mean follow-up was 7.1 years (range from 2 to 16.6 years). There was no difference in implant survivorship (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.01; p = 0.25; I2 = 0%), MTPM (weighted mean difference [WMD], 0.13 mm; 95% CI, -0.69-0.95; p = 0.75; I2 = 89.3%) and radiolucent line (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.57-3.23; p = 0.48; I2 = 54%) between the cementless and cemented methods. There was a mean 0.22° more rotation in the full-cementless fixation group (95% CI, 0.13-0.32; p < 0.01; I2 = 28.5%). There were no significant differences relating to clinical outcomes (WOMAC score, KSS score, postoperative range of movement, blood loss and complications) between the two fixation groups.
Conclusions: Although more overall component rotation is found in full-cementless fixation, the implant survivorship and clinical efficacy are likely similar between full-cementless and full-cemented fixation. However, future RCTs with similar cementless prosthetic coating and longer-term follow-up are still needed to confirm our findings.
Keywords: Cement; Cementless; Fixation; Total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Copyright © 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
What Is the Survivorship of TKA With a Twin-peg or Spikes-and-keel Cementless Implant Compared With Cemented? A Registry-based Cohort Study.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5;483(7):1288-1298. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003385. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39915112
-
Long-term effects of cemented and cementless fixations of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 12;16(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02762-2. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34641924 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of infection in cemented, cementless and hybrid primary total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials.ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1289-1298. doi: 10.1111/ans.16078. Epub 2020 Jun 28. ANZ J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32594649
-
Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3200-3211. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3820-4. Epub 2015 Dec 19. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. PMID: 26685696
-
Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):736-745. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4244-5. Epub 2016 Jul 19. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017. PMID: 27436195
Cited by
-
Early clinical outcome and learning curve following unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty after introduction of a novel total knee arthroplasty system.World J Orthop. 2020 Oct 18;11(10):431-441. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.431. eCollection 2020 Oct 18. World J Orthop. 2020. PMID: 33134106 Free PMC article.
-
Tibial Component Undersizing Is Related to High Degrees of Implant Migration Following Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of Radiostereometric Analysis Data for 111 Patients with 2-Year Follow-up.JB JS Open Access. 2023 Aug 9;8(3):e23.00032. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00032. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep. JB JS Open Access. 2023. PMID: 37575962 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of fixation type on the survivorship of contemporary total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years of age: a register-based study of 115,177 knees in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 2000-2016.Acta Orthop. 2020 Apr;91(2):184-190. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1710373. Epub 2020 Jan 13. Acta Orthop. 2020. PMID: 31928097 Free PMC article.
-
Global trends in fixation methods for primary total knee arthroplasty: An international registry-based analysis and review of outcomes.J Orthop. 2025 May 23;67:230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.031. eCollection 2025 Sep. J Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40519774
-
Gap patterns and radiographic follow-up of newer-generation cementless total knee arthroplasty designs.Can J Surg. 2024 Mar 7;67(2):E85-E90. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008223. Print 2024 Jan-Feb. Can J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38453351 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical