Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Jun;27(6):1656-1663.
doi: 10.1002/pon.4735. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Focusing on cancer patients' intentions to use psychooncological support: A longitudinal, mixed-methods study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Focusing on cancer patients' intentions to use psychooncological support: A longitudinal, mixed-methods study

T Tondorf et al. Psychooncology. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Distress screening programs aim to ensure appropriate psychooncological support for cancer patients, but many eligible patients do not use these services. To improve distress management, we need to better understand patients' supportive care needs. In this paper, we report the first key finding from a longitudinal study that focused on patients' intentions to use psychooncological support and its association with distress and uptake of the psychooncology service.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic and assessed distress, intention to use psychooncological support, and uptake of the psychooncology service by using the Distress Thermometer, a semistructured interview, and hospital records. We analyzed data with a mixed-methods approach.

Results: Of 333 patients (mean age 61 years; 55% male; 54% Distress Thermometer ≥ 5), 25% intended to use the psychooncology service (yes), 33% were ambivalent (maybe), and 42% reported no intention (no). Overall, 23% had attended the psychooncology service 4 months later. Ambivalent patients reported higher distress than patients with no intention (odds ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval [1.06-1.32]) but showed significantly lower uptake behavior than patients with an intention (odds ratio = 14.04, 95% confidence interval [6.74-29.24]). Qualitative analyses revealed that ambivalent patients (maybe) emphasized fears and uncertainties, while patients with clear intentions (yes/no) emphasized knowledge, attitudes, and coping concepts.

Conclusions: We identified a vulnerable group of ambivalent patients with high distress levels and low uptake behavior. To optimize distress screening programs, we suggest addressing and discussing patients' supportive care needs in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: Distress Thermometer; cancer; health-care delivery; needs; oncology; psychological support; psychooncology; reasons; screening; uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Description of patients' distress, intention, and uptake by distress level. Abbreviations: DT, Distress Thermometer; T0, screening; T1, baseline; T2, follow‐up

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Di Matteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment. Meta‐analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2101‐2107. - PubMed
    1. Stark D, Kiely M, Smith A, Velikova G, House A, Selby P. Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: their nature, associations, and relation to quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(14):3137‐3148. - PubMed
    1. Mehnert A, Brähler E, Faller H, et al. Four‐week prevalence of mental disorders in patients with cancer across major tumor entities. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(31):3540‐3546. - PubMed
    1. Singer S, Das‐Munshi J, Brähler E. Prevalence of mental health conditions in cancer patients in acute care—a meta‐analysis. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(5):925‐930. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, et al. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative‐care settings: a meta‐analysis of 94 interview‐based studies. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(2):160‐174. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources