Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb 23;34(2):129-138.
doi: 10.1002/joa3.12035. eCollection 2018 Apr.

Portable out-of-hospital electrocardiography: A review of current technologies

Agam Bansal  1 , Rajnish Joshi  2
Affiliations
Review

Portable out-of-hospital electrocardiography: A review of current technologies

Agam Bansal et al. J Arrhythm. .

Abstract

Background: Availability of portable and home-based electrocardiography (ECG) is an important medical innovation, which has a potential to transform medical care. We performed this review to understand the current state of out-of-hospital portable ECG technologies with respect to their scope, ease of use, data transmission capabilities, and diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: We conducted PubMed and Internet searches for "handheld" or "wearable" or "patch" electrocardiography devices to enlist available technologies. We also searched PubMed with names of individual devices to obtain additional citations. We classified available devices as a "single limb lead ECG recording devices" and chest-lead "ECG recording devices." If a device used more than three electrodes, it was defined as a conventional electrocardiography or Holter machine and was excluded from this review.

Results: We identified a total of 15 devices. Overall, only six of these devices (five single lead and one chest lead) featured in published medical literature as identified from PubMed search. A total of 13 citations were available for the single limb lead ECG recording devices and 6 citations for the chest-lead ECG recording devices.

Conclusions: Despite the increase in number of such devices, published biomedical literature regarding their diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, or utility is scant.

Keywords: arrhythmia; chest leads; electrocardiography (ECG); handheld devices; holter monitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Single‐lead electrocardiography (ECG) devices
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multiple‐lead electrocardiography (ECG) devices
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO . About cardiovascular diseases [Internet]. Who.int. 2017 [cited 2017 Mar 21]. Available from http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/about_cvd/en/
    1. Coppola G, Carità P, Corrado E, et al. ST segment elevations: always a marker of acute myocardial infarction? Indian Heart J. 2013;65:412–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta M, Kurmi M, Sharma B, Chen L, Shahi R, Jian S. Clinical significance of ST segment depression in lead aVR to predict culprit artery in an acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Nepalese Heart J. 2015;12:5.
    1. Mason J. Electrophysiological diagnostic procedures In: Goldman L, Claude Bennett J, editors. Cecil textbook of medicine XXI edn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company, 2000; p. 230–2.
    1. Ritter MA, Kochhäuser S, Duning T, et al. Occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke: detection by 7‐day electrocardiogram versus implantable cardiac monitors. Stroke. 2013;44:1449–52. - PubMed