Glut-1 expression in small cervical biopsies is prognostic in cervical cancers treated with chemoradiation
- PMID: 29658001
- PMCID: PMC5893520
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.01.003
Glut-1 expression in small cervical biopsies is prognostic in cervical cancers treated with chemoradiation
Abstract
Background/purpose: Chemoradiation (CRT) is standard therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). However, there is a lack of biomarkers to identify patients at high relapse-risk. We examine metabolic (glucose transporter-1 [Glut-1]), hypoxic (hypoxia inducible factor [HIF-1α]; carbonic anhydrase [CA-9]) and proliferative (Ki-67) markers for prognostic utility in LACC.
Materials/methods: 60 LACC patients treated with CRT had pre-treatment biopsies. Immunohistochemistry was performed for Glut-1, HIF-1a and CA-9, to generate a histoscore from intensity and percentage staining; and Ki-67 scored by percentage of positive cells. For each biomarker, treatment response and survival was compared between low and high-staining groups by logrank testing and multivariate analyses.
Results: High Glut-1 expression was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS), (hazard ratio [HR] 2.8, p = 0.049) and overall survival (OS), (HR 5.0, p = 0.011) on multifactor analysis adjusting for stage, node positivity, tumour volume and uterine corpus invasion. High Glut-1 correlated with increased risk of distant failure (HR 14.6, p = 0.001) but not local failure. Low Glut-1 was associated with higher complete metabolic response rate on post-therapy positron emission tomography scan (odds ratio 3.4, p = 0.048). Ki-67 was significantly associated with PFS only (HR 1.19 per 10 units increase, p = 0.033). Biomarkers for hypoxia were not associated with outcome.
Conclusions: High Glut-1 in LACC is associated with poor outcome post CRT. If prospectively validated, Glut-1 may help select patients for more intensive treatment regimens.
Keywords: Biomarker; Cervical cancer; Glut-1; Immunohistochemistry.
Figures
References
-
- Jemal A., Bray F., Center M.M., Ferlay J., Ward E., Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
-
- Landoni F., Maneo A., Colombo A. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997;350:535–540. - PubMed
-
- Edge S.B., Compton C.C. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–1474. - PubMed
-
- Grigsby P.W., Siegel B.A., Dehdashti F., Rader J., Zoberi I. Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2167. - PubMed
-
- Grigsby P.W., Siegel B.A., Dehdashti F., Mutch D.G. Posttherapy surveillance monitoring of cervical cancer by FDG-PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55:907–913. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
