Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov;40(1):357-362.
doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2018.1459306.

Management of staghorn renal stones

Affiliations
Review

Management of staghorn renal stones

Akif Diri et al. Ren Fail. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Staghorn stones are large branching stones that fill part of all of the renal pelvis and renal calyces and they can be complete or partial depending on the level of occupancy of the collecting system. Although kidney stones are commoner in men, staghorn stones are less often reported in men compared to women and they are usually unilateral. Due to the significant morbidity and potential mortality attributed to staghorn stones, prompt assessment and treatment is mandatory. Conversely, conservative treatment has been shown to carry a mortality rate of 28% in 10-year period and 36% risk of developing significant renal impairment. Staghorn stones are, therefore, significant disease entity that should be managed aggressively and effectively. Generally, the gold standard treatment for staghorn stones is surgical with a view to achieve stone-free collecting system and preserve renal function. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be the recommended first-line treatment for staghorn stones. Other non-surgical options are usually considered in combination with surgery or as monotherapy only if patients are surgically unfit. The decision for optimal treatment of staghorn stones should be individualized according to the circumstances of the patient involved and in order to do so, a closer look at the advantages and disadvantages of each option is necessary.

Keywords: Kidney; management; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; staghorn stone; struvite.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Healy KA, Ogan K.. Pathophysiology and management of infectious staghorn calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34:363–374. - PubMed
    1. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173:1991–2000. - PubMed
    1. Rieu P. [Infective lithiasis]. Ann Urol (Paris). 2005;39:16–29. - PubMed
    1. Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM, et al. Renal stone epidemiology: a 25 year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int. 1979;16:624–631. - PubMed
    1. Hiatt RA, Dales LG, Friedman GD, et al. Frequency of urolithiasis in a prepaid medical care program. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115:255–265. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources