Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 1;9(2):63-69.
doi: 10.1093/advances/nmx020.

Perspective: Total, Added, or Free? What Kind of Sugars Should We Be Talking About?

Affiliations

Perspective: Total, Added, or Free? What Kind of Sugars Should We Be Talking About?

David J Mela et al. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

There is consistent public guidance to limit sugars intakes. However, WHO recommendations are for "free" sugars, whereas some other guidance documents and public discussion focus on "added" sugars, and globally most food labeling states "total" sugars. Total sugars comprise all mono- and disaccharides, regardless of source, whereas both added and free sugars exclude the sugars that naturally occur in dairy products and intact fruit and vegetables. Definitions of added and free sugars differ mainly in their respective exclusion or inclusion of sugars in juiced or pureed fruit and vegetables. To date, there has been little evidence-based analysis of the scientific basis for these different sugar classifications or implications of their adoption for consumer communication and nutrition labeling. Evidence of discriminating relations of total compared with added or free sugars with weight gain or energy intake, type 2 diabetes, and dental caries was identified from recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The relations were weakest for total sugars and most consistent for dietary sources corresponding to free sugars (including sugars added to and in fruit juices). Consideration of these health outcomes suggests that the emphasis for intake monitoring, public health guidance, and consumer communication should be on free sugars. However, at present, the adoption of free sugars for these purposes would also carry challenges related to implementation, including consumer understanding, consensus on specifications, and current (labeling) regulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition Carbohydrates and Health. London: TSO; 2015.
    1. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Washington (DC): USDA; US Department of Health and Human Services; 2015.
    1. Erickson J, Sadeghirad B, Lytvyn L, Slavin J, Johnston BC. The scientific basis of guideline recommendations on sugar intake. Ann Intern Med 2017;166(4):257–67. - PubMed
    1. Erickson J, Slavin J. Total, added, and free sugars: are restrictive guidelines science-based or achievable? Nutrients 2015;7(4):2866–78. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types