Use of Unpalatable Forages by Ruminants: The Influence of Experience with the Biophysical and Social Environment
- PMID: 29662017
- PMCID: PMC5946140
- DOI: 10.3390/ani8040056
Use of Unpalatable Forages by Ruminants: The Influence of Experience with the Biophysical and Social Environment
Abstract
Unpalatable forage resources (low nutrient density, potentially toxic metabolites) are widespread and represent a challenge for ruminant nutrition, health, and welfare. Our objective was to synthesize the role of biophysical and social experience on the use of unpalatable forages by ruminants, and highlight derived behavioural solutions for the well-being of soils, plants, and animals. Environmental experiences early in life modulate gene expression and promote learning, which alters morpho-physiological and psychological mechanisms that modify behavioural responses and change food and habitat selection. In this process, ruminants can become better adapted to the habitat where they are reared. Moreover, experiential learning provides flexibility in diet selection, which is critical for changing foraging environments. Learned associations between unpalatable and palatable foods, if ingested in appropriate amounts, sequence, and close temporal association, induce the development of preference for the former type of food. In this way, a more uniform use of resources can be achieved from the landscape level down to the individual plant, with the associated benefits to ecosystem integrity and stability. Ruminants can also learn the medicinal benefits of ingesting foods with toxins (e.g., condensed tannins and saponins with antiparasitic properties). This knowledge on behavioural processes can be translated into behavioural applications that provide low-cost solutions to many challenges that producers face in managing sustainable livestock production systems.
Keywords: diet selection; early experience; environmental experience; habitat selection; ruminants; unpalatable forages.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Links between ruminants' food preference and their welfare.Animal. 2010 Jul;4(7):1240-7. doi: 10.1017/S1751731110000467. Animal. 2010. PMID: 22444619
-
Forage use to improve environmental sustainability of ruminant production.J Anim Sci. 2016 Aug;94(8):3147-3158. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0141. J Anim Sci. 2016. PMID: 27695772 Review.
-
Review: Optimizing ruminant conversion of feed protein to human food protein.Animal. 2018 Aug;12(8):1722-1734. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117002592. Epub 2017 Nov 20. Animal. 2018. PMID: 29151400 Review.
-
Role of ruminant livestock in sustainable agricultural systems.J Anim Sci. 1996 Jun;74(6):1406-9. doi: 10.2527/1996.7461406x. J Anim Sci. 1996. PMID: 8791215 Review.
-
How the foraging decisions of a small ruminant are influenced by past feeding experiences with low-quality food.Behav Processes. 2016 May;126:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 27. Behav Processes. 2016. PMID: 26927320
Cited by
-
Effect of KOROPASS, an extruded jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis)-derived supplement, on productivity and economic performance of beef cattle.Vet World. 2020 Mar;13(3):593-596. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.593-596. Epub 2020 Mar 29. Vet World. 2020. PMID: 32367969 Free PMC article.
-
Nutrition profile and rumen fermentation of Tithonia diversifolia fermented with Lactobacillus bulgaricus at different times and doses.J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2024 Mar 31;11(1):146-152. doi: 10.5455/javar.2024.k759. eCollection 2024 Mar. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2024. PMID: 38680792 Free PMC article.
-
Selection of Forage Resources by Juvenile Goats in a Cafeteria Trial: Effect of Browsing Experience, Nutrient and Secondary Compound Content.Animals (Basel). 2022 May 21;12(10):1317. doi: 10.3390/ani12101317. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35625163 Free PMC article.
-
Plant tannin for grazing ruminant growth.Anim Front. 2025 Aug 6;15(3):47-58. doi: 10.1093/af/vfaf026. eCollection 2025 Jun. Anim Front. 2025. PMID: 40808886 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Freeland W.J., Janzen D.H. Strategies in herbivory by mammals: The role of plant secondary compounds. Am. Nat. 1974;108:269–289. doi: 10.1086/282907. - DOI
-
- Hofmann R.R. Anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Church D.C., editor. The Ruminant Animal. Prentice Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: 1988. pp. 14–43.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources