Relationship Between Quantitative MRI Biomarkers and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Cartilage Repair Surgery: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 29662912
- PMCID: PMC5898666
- DOI: 10.1177/2325967118765448
Relationship Between Quantitative MRI Biomarkers and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Cartilage Repair Surgery: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Treatment of articular cartilage injuries remains a clinical challenge, and the optimal tools to monitor and predict clinical outcomes are unclear. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) allows for a noninvasive biochemical evaluation of cartilage and may offer advantages in monitoring outcomes after cartilage repair surgery.
Hypothesis: qMRI sequences will correlate with early pain and functional measures.
Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A PubMed search was performed with the following search terms: knee AND (cartilage repair OR cartilage restoration OR cartilage surgery) AND (delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI OR t1-rho OR T2 mapping OR dgemric OR sodium imaging OR quantitative imaging). Studies were included if correlation data were included on quantitative imaging results and patient outcome scores.
Results: Fourteen articles were included in the analysis. Eight studies showed a significant relationship between quantitative cartilage imaging and patient outcome scores, while 6 showed no relationship. T2 mapping was examined in 11 studies, delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in 4 studies, sodium imaging in 2 studies, glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer (gagCEST) in 1 study, and diffusion-weighted imaging in 1 study. Five studies on T2 mapping showed a correlation between T2 relaxation times and clinical outcome scores. Two dGEMRIC studies found a correlation between T1 relaxation times and clinical outcome scores.
Conclusion: Multiple studies on T2 mapping, dGEMRIC, and diffusion-weighted imaging showed significant correlations with patient-reported outcome measures after cartilage repair surgery, although other studies showed no significant relationship. qMRI sequences may offer a noninvasive method to monitor cartilage repair tissue in a clinically meaningful way, but further refinements in imaging protocols and clinical interpretation are necessary to improve utility.
Keywords: T2 mapping; cartilage repair surgery; dGEMRIC; quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.
Conflict of interest statement
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.J.C. receives research support from Aesculap/B. Braun, Arthrex, Medipost, and the National Institutes of Health (NIAMS and NICDH); receives royalties from Arthrex, DJ Orthopaedics, Elsevier, Saunders-Mosby Elsevier, and SLACK Inc; is a paid consultant for Arthrex and Regentis; has stock/stock options in Carticept and Regentis; and receives fellowship educational support from Athletico, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, and Tornier. D.A.L. has received fellowship educational/research support from Arthrex and Smith & Nephew.
Figures
References
-
- Blackman AJ, Smith MV, Flanigan DC, Matava MJ, Wright RW, Brophy RH. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes after cartilage repair surgery in the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(6):1426–1434. - PubMed
-
- Brown DS, Durkan MG, Foss EW, Szumowski J, Crawford DC. Temporal in vivo assessment of fresh osteochondral allograft transplants to the distal aspect of the femur by dGEMRIC (delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage) and zonal T2 mapping MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(7):564–572. - PubMed
-
- Burstein D, Gray M. Is MRI fulfilling its promise for molecular imaging of cartilage in arthritis? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(11):1087–1090. - PubMed
-
- de Windt TS, Welsch GH, Brittberg M, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1695–1702. - PubMed