Predictors of complications after direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix from a multicentre randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 29663320
- PMCID: PMC6099293
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10865
Predictors of complications after direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix from a multicentre randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: In the multicentre randomized trial BRIOS (Breast Reconstruction In One Stage), direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was associated with a markedly higher postoperative complication rate compared with two-stage tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. This study aimed to identify factors that contribute to the occurrence of complications after DTI ADM-assisted breast reconstruction.
Methods: Data were obtained from the BRIOS study, including all patients treated with DTI ADM-assisted breast reconstruction. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of postoperative complications.
Results: Fifty-nine patients (91 breasts) were included, of whom 27 (35 breasts) developed a surgical complication. Reoperations were performed in 29 breasts (32 per cent), with prosthesis removal in 22 (24 per cent). In multivariable analyses, mastectomy weight was associated with complications (odds ratio (OR) 1·94, 95 per cent c.i. 1·33 to 2·83), reoperations (OR 1·70, 1·12 to 2·59) and removal of the implant (OR 1·55, 1·11 to 2·17). Younger patients (OR 1·07, 1·01 to 1·13) and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 4·83, 1·15 to 20·24) more frequently required reoperation. In univariable analyses, adjuvant radiotherapy showed a trend towards more complications (OR 7·23, 0·75 to 69·95) and removal of the implant (OR 5·12, 0·76 to 34·44), without reaching statistical significance.
Conclusion: Breast size appeared to be the most significant predictor of complications in DTI ADM-assisted breast reconstruction. The technique should preferably be performed in patients with small to moderate sized breasts. Registration number: NTR5446 ( http://www.trialregister.nl).
© 2018 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
References
-
- Potter S, Browning D, Savović J, Holcombe C, Blazeby JM. Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant‐based breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 1010–1025. - PubMed
-
- Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Berry C, Hunsicker LM. Acellular dermal matrix‐assisted direct‐to‐implant breast reconstruction and capsular contracture: a 13‐year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 329–337. - PubMed
-
- Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix‐assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68: 346–356. - PubMed
-
- Nguyen TJ, Carey JN, Wong AK. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant‐based breast reconstruction: evaluating the evidence. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 1553–1561. - PubMed
-
- Lardi AM, Ho‐Asjoe M, Mohanna PN, Farhadi J. Immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: factors affecting outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67: 1098–1105. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
