Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Apr 17;13(4):e0192073.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192073. eCollection 2018.

Accuracy and precision of ScvO2 measured with the CeVOX-device: A prospective study in patients with a wide variation of ScvO2-values

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Accuracy and precision of ScvO2 measured with the CeVOX-device: A prospective study in patients with a wide variation of ScvO2-values

Alexander Herner et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Central-venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) is a key parameter of hemodynamic monitoring and has been suggested as therapeutic goal for resuscitation. Several devices offer continuous monitoring features. The CeVOX-device (Pulsion Medical Systems) uses a fibre-optic probe inserted through a conventional central-venous catheter (CVC) to obtain continuous ScvO2.

Objectives: Since there is a lack of studies validating the CeVOX, we prospectively analyzed data from 24 patients with CeVOX-monitoring. To increase the yield of lower ScvO2-values, 12 patients were equipped with a femoral CVC.

Methods: During the 8h study period ScvO2_CeVOX was documented immediately before withdrawal of blood to measure ScvO2 by blood gas analysis (ScvO2_BGA) 6min, 1h, 4h, 5h and 8h after the initial calibration. No further calibrations were performed.

Results: In patients with jugular CVC (primary endpoint; 60 measurements), bias, lower and upper limits of agreement (LLOA; ULOA) and percentage error (PE) of the estimate of ScvO2 (ScvO2_CeVOX_jug) were acceptable with 0.45%, -13.0%, 13.9% and 16.6%, respectively. As supposed, ScvO2 was lower in the femoral compared to the jugular measurements (69.5±10.7 vs. 79.4±5.8%; p<0.001). While the bias (0.64%) was still acceptable, LLOA (-23.8%), ULOA (25.0%) and PE (34.5%) were substantially higher for femoral assessment of ScvO2 by the CeVOX (ScvO2_CeVOX_fem). Analysis of the entire data-pool with jugular as well as femoral CVCs allowed for a multivariate analysis which demonstrated that the position of the CVC per se was not independently associated with the bias ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA. The amount of the bias |ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA| was independently associated with the amount of the change of ScvO2_CeVOX compared to the initial calibration to ScvO2_BGA_baseline (|ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA_baseline|) as well as with low values of ScvO2_BGA_baseline. Furthermore, increasing time to the initial calibration was associated to the amount of the bias with borderline significance. A statistical model based on |ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA_baseline| and "time to last calibration" derived from an evaluation dataset (80 of 120 datasets, 16 of 24) provided a ROC-AUC of 0.903 to predict an amount of the bias |ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA| ≥5% in an independent validation group (40 datasets of 8 patients).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the CeVOX device is capable to detect stability or instability of ScvO2_BGA. ScvO2_CeVOX accurately estimates ScvO2_BGA in case of stable values. However, intermittent measurement of ScvO2_BGA and re-calibration should be performed in case of substantial changes in ScvO2_CeVOX compared to baseline. Therefore, continuous measurement of ScvO2 with the CeVOX cannot replace ScvO2_BGA in instable patients. On the other hand, CeVOX might be useful for the monitoring of stable patients as a pre-test tool for more differentiated monitoring in case of changes in ScvO2_CeVOX.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Wolfgang Huber is member of the Medical Advisory Board of Pulsion Medical Systems SE, Feldkirchen, Germany. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Bland Altman plot comparing ScvO2_CeVOX_jug to ScvO2_BGA derived from measurements with jugular CVC.
ScvO2_CeVOX_jug: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. ScvO2_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis. CVC: Central venous catheter.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Bland Altman plot comparing ScvO2_CeVOX_fem to ScvO2_BGA derived from measurements with femoral CVC.
ScvO2_CeVOX_fem: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. ScvO2_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis. CVC: Central venous catheter.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Bland Altman plot comparing ScvO2_CeVOX to ScvO2_BGA derived from all measurements (jugular or femoral CVC).
ScvO2_CeVOX: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. ScvO2_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis. CVC: Central venous catheter.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Correlation of the amount of the bias |ScvO2_CeVOX–ScvO2_BGA| with a prediction formula derived from the total datset (n = 120).
ScvO2_CeVOX: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. ScvO2_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis.
Fig 5
Fig 5. ROC curve comparing different predictors of |ScvO2_CeVOX–ScvO2_BGA| ≥5% in the evaluation group (n = 80).
“Prediction of |bias|”: model predicting |ScvO2_CeVOX–ScvO2_BGA| which was derived from multiple regression analysis within the evaluation group. ROC: receiver operating characteristic. AUC: area under the curve. ScvO2_CeVOX: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. ScvO2_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis.
Fig 6
Fig 6. ROC curve comparing different predictors of |ScvO2_CeVOX–ScvO2_BGA| ≥5% in the independent validation group (n = 40).
Prediction of |bias|: model predicting |ScvO2_CeVOX–ScvO2_BGA| which was derived from multiple regression analysis within the evaluation group. ROC: receiver operating characteristic. AUC: area under the curve. ScvO2_CeVOX: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from the CeVOX-device. ScvO2_BGA: Central venous oxygen saturation derived from blood gas analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rivers EP, Ander DS, Powell D (2001) Central venous oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill patient. Curr Opin Crit Care 7: 204–211. - PubMed
    1. Reinhart K, Kuhn HJ, Hartog C, Bredle DL (2004) Continuous central venous and pulmonary artery oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 30: 1572–1578. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2337-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, et al. (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345: 1368–1377. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rady MY, Rivers EP, Nowak RM (1996) Resuscitation of the critically ill in the ED: responses of blood pressure, heart rate, shock index, central venous oxygen saturation, and lactate. Am J Emerg Med 14: 218–225. - PubMed
    1. Squara P (2014) Central venous oxygenation: when physiology explains apparent discrepancies. Crit Care 18: 579 doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0579-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types