Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004586.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004586.

Ventricular Assist Device Utilization in Heart Transplant Candidates: Nationwide Variability and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes

Affiliations

Ventricular Assist Device Utilization in Heart Transplant Candidates: Nationwide Variability and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes

Lauren K Truby et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have become a standard treatment choice in advanced heart failure patients. We hypothesized that practice patterns with regards to CF-LVAD utilization vary significantly among transplant centers and impact waitlist outcomes.

Methods and results: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to identify adult patients who were waitlisted for heart transplantation (HT) between 2008 and 2015. Each patient was assigned a propensity score based on likelihood of receiving a durable CF-LVAD before or while waitlisted. The primary outcomes of interest were death or delisting for worsening status and HT at 1 year. A total of 22 863 patients from 92 centers were identified. Among these, 9013 (39.4%) were mechanically supported. CF-LVAD utilization varied significantly between and within United Network for Organ Sharing regions. Freedom from waitlist death or delisting was significantly lower in propensity-score-matched patients who were mechanically supported versus medically managed (83.5% versus 79.2%; P<0.001). However, cumulative incidence of HT was also lower in mechanically supported patients (53.3% versus 63.6%; P<0.001). Congruous mechanical and medical bridging strategies based on clinical risk profile were associated with lower risk of death or delisting (hazard ratio, 0.88; P=0.027) and higher likelihood of HT (hazard ratio, 1.14; P<0.001).

Conclusions: CF-LVAD utilization may lower waitlist mortality at the expense of lower likelihood of HT. Decision to use CF-LVAD and timing of transition should be individualized based on patient-, center-, and region-level risk factors to achieve optimal outcomes.

Keywords: heart transplantation; heart-assist devices; propensity; registries; score; waiting lists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study Population
Figure 2
Figure 2. Nationwide Variability in Device Utilization in Heart Transplantation Candidates (A) Among UNOS Regions (B) Within UNOS Regions
Figure 3
Figure 3. Transplant Waitlist Outcomes of Patients with Medical versus Mechanical Bridging Strategy (A) Freedom from Waitlist Death or Delisting for Worsening Status (B) Cumulative Incidence of Heart Transplantation
Figure 4
Figure 4
Transplant Waitlist Outcomes of Patients Based on Congruous versus Incongruous Utilization of Bridging Strategies (A) Freedom from Waitlist Death or Delisting for Worsening Status Based (B) Cumulative Incidence of Heart Transplantation

References

    1. Lund LH, Edwards LB, Dipchand AI, Goldfarb S, Kucheryavaya AY, Levvey BJ, Meiser B, Rossano JW, Yusen RD, Stehlik J International Society for H and Lung T. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-third Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2016; Focus Theme: Primary Diagnostic Indications for Transplant. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2016;35:1158–1169. - PubMed
    1. Transplantation ISHLT. Adult Heart Transplantation Statistics. 2014;Slide 41 https://www.ishlt.org/registries/slides.asp?slides=heartLungRegistry&yea....
    1. Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, McGee EC, Birks EJ, Cotts WG, Gregoric I, Howard Frazier O, Icenogle T, Najjar SS, Boyce SW, Acker MA, John R, Hathaway DR, Najarian KB, Aaronson KD HeartWare Bridge to Transplant ATI. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2013;32:675–83. - PubMed
    1. Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, John R, Boyle AJ, Aaronson KD, Conte JV, Naka Y, Mancini D, Delgado RM, MacGillivray TE, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH HeartMate IICI. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;357:885–96. - PubMed
    1. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Miller MA, Ulisney KL, Baldwin JT, Young JB. Second INTERMACS annual report: more than 1,000 primary left ventricular assist device implants. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2010;29:1–10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types