The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement
- PMID: 29667082
- PMCID: PMC6096654
- DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8
The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement
Abstract
Traditionally, the visual analogue scale (VAS) has been proposed to overcome the limitations of ordinal measures from Likert-type scales. However, the function of VASs to overcome the limitations of response styles to Likert-type scales has not yet been addressed. Previous research using ranking and paired comparisons to compensate for the response styles of Likert-type scales has suffered from limitations, such as that the total score of ipsative measures is a constant that cannot be analyzed by means of many common statistical techniques. In this study we propose a new scale, called the Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking, and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP), which can be used to collect rating, ranking, and paired-comparison data simultaneously, while avoiding the limitations of each of these data collection methods. The characteristics, use, and analytic method of VAS-RRPs, as well as how they overcome the disadvantages of Likert-type scales, ranking, and VASs, are discussed. On the basis of analyses of simulated and empirical data, this study showed that VAS-RRPs improved reliability, response style bias, and parameter recovery. Finally, we have also designed a VAS-RRP Generator for researchers' construction and administration of their own VAS-RRPs.
Keywords: CTCU model; Likert-type scale; Multi-item VAS; Paired comparison; Ranking; VAS-RRP.
Figures
References
-
- Albaum G. The Likert scale revisited: An alternate version. Journal of the Market Research Society. 1997;39:331–348. doi: 10.1177/147078539703900202. - DOI
-
- Allen IE, Seaman CA. Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress. 2007;40:64–65.
-
- Alwin DF. Information transmission in the survey interview: Number of response categories and the reliability of attitude measurement. In: Marsden PV, editor. Sociological methodology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell; 1992. pp. 83–118.
-
- Babakus E, Ferguson CE, Jöreskog KG. The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research. 1987;37:72–141.
-
- Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1988;16:74–94. doi: 10.1007/BF02723327. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
