Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;35(1-4):50-79.
doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0076-z.

Ethical challenges faced by healthcare professionals who care for suicidal patients: a scoping review

Affiliations

Ethical challenges faced by healthcare professionals who care for suicidal patients: a scoping review

Victoria Saigle et al. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

For each one of the approximately 800,000 people who die from suicide every year, an additional twenty people attempt suicide. Many of these attempts result in hospitalization or in contact with other healthcare services. However, many personal, educational, and institutional barriers make it difficult for healthcare professionals to care for suicidal individuals. We reviewed literature that discusses suicidal patients in healthcare settings in order to highlight common ethical issues and to identify knowledge gaps. A sample was generated via PubMed using keywords "[(ethics OR *ethic*) AND suicid*] AND [English (Language) OR French (Language)]" (final N = 52), ethics content was extracted according to scoping review methodology, and categorized thematically. We identified three main areas posing ethical challenges for health professionals caring for suicidal individuals and their families. These were: (1) making clinical decisions for patients in acute care or when presented with specific circumstances; (2) issues arising from therapeutic relationships in chronic care, and (3) organizational factors. There is considerable uncertainty about how to resolve ethical issues when caring for someone who is suicidal. The stigma associated with suicide and mental illness, problems associated with risk-benefit assessments, and the fear of being held liable for malpractice should a patient die by suicide were overarching themes present across these three categories. Caring for suicidal patients is clinically and ethically challenging. The current literature highlights the complexity and range of decisions that need to be made. More attention should be paid to the difficulties faced by healthcare professionals and the development of solutions.

Keywords: Clinical ethics; Ethics; Healthcare services; Prevention; Scoping review; Suicide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfandre, D. 2011. Response to: “Do-not-resuscitate orders in suicidal patients: Clinical, ethical, and legal dilemmas.”. Psychosomatics 52 (5): 498–498. - DOI
    1. Anderson, M., P. Standen, and J. Noon. 2003. Nurses’ and doctors’ perceptions of young people who engage in suicidal behaviour: A contemporary grounded theory analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies 40 (6): 587–597. - DOI
    1. Appel, J.M. 2012. “How hard it is that we have to die:” Rethinking suicide liability for psychiatrists. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (4): 527–536. - DOI
    1. Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. - DOI
    1. Barrett, N.A. 1997. The medical student and the suicidal patient. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (5): 277–281. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources