Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 1;60(1):79-91.
doi: 10.2478/folmed-2018-0015.

Budgetary Impact of Medicinal Therapies for Rare Diseases in Bulgaria

Affiliations

Budgetary Impact of Medicinal Therapies for Rare Diseases in Bulgaria

Georgi G Iskrov et al. Folia Med (Plovdiv). .

Abstract

Background: Rare diseases have been continually outlined as one of the causes for the National Health Insurance Fund's (NHIF) deficit spending in Bulgaria.

Aim: To estimate the budgetary impact of rare disease medicinal therapies from NHIF perspective for 2014 and 2016.

Materials and methods: Budgetary impact of rare diseases is calculated as a percentage of NHIF total pharmaceutical spending. Total expenditure per ICD-10 code, mean annual number of patients reimbursed and mean annual cost per patient are analysed.

Results: Budgetary impact of rare diseases reached a plateau of about 9% of NHIF total pharmaceutical spending for 2014-2016. Mean number of patients reimbursed and mean annual cost per patient increased by median rates of 4.27% and 2.54%, respectively. Glycogen storage disease, neuropathic heredofamilial amyloidosis and C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency stood out, as they had the second, fourth and fifth most expensive medicinal treatment cost. While accounting for only 92 patients in 2016, these three conditions contributed for 22.89% of NHIF total expenditure on rare disease medicinal therapies. For comparison, coagulation defects, with the biggest total cost per indication, had a similar budgetary impact - 24.88%, but for 277 patients reimbursed.

Conclusions: Our study does not support the concerns about uncontrolled growth of expenditures for rare disease medicinal therapies. Nevertheless, there is a need for enhanced post-marketing surveillance and performance-based payment of these treatments. Development, collection and analysis of local real-world data have been increasingly applied as a tool to advance these health policy goals.

Keywords: budgetary impact; orphan drugs; post-marketing surveil-lance; rare diseases; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources