Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jul 13;218(4):633-644.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy212.

First-in-Human Randomized, Controlled Trial of Mosaic HIV-1 Immunogens Delivered via a Modified Vaccinia Ankara Vector

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

First-in-Human Randomized, Controlled Trial of Mosaic HIV-1 Immunogens Delivered via a Modified Vaccinia Ankara Vector

Lindsey R Baden et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Mosaic immunogens are bioinformatically engineered human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) sequences designed to elicit clade-independent coverage against globally circulating HIV-1 strains.

Methods: This phase 1, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled healthy HIV-uninfected adults who received 2 doses of a modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA)-vectored HIV-1 bivalent mosaic immunogen vaccine or placebo on days 0 and 84. Two groups were enrolled: those who were HIV-1 vaccine naive (n = 15) and those who had received an HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) 4-6 years earlier (n = 10). We performed prespecified blinded cellular and humoral immunogenicity analyses at days 0, 14, 28, 84, 98, 112, 168, 270, and 365.

Results: All 50 planned vaccinations were administered. Vaccination was safe and generally well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. Both cellular and humoral cross-clade immune responses were elicited after 1 or 2 vaccinations in all participants in the HIV-1 vaccine-naive group. Env-specific responses were induced after a single immunization in nearly all subjects who had previously received the prototype Ad26.ENVA.01 vaccine.

Conclusions: No safety concerns were identified, and multiclade HIV-1-specific immune responses were elicited.

Clinical trials registration: NCT02218125.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Local and systemic reactogenicity. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 8 days following each vaccination. Shown are the proportions of vaccinees experiencing local reactogenicity (including pain and/or tenderness, erythema, pruritus, warmth, swelling, or induration; A) or systemic symptoms (fatigue, myalgia, headache, chills, nausea, or vomiting; B) following the first or second vaccination by dose group. See Methods for descriptions of group 1, group 2, and placebo recipients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Interferon γ enzyme-linked immunospot responses measured using peptide pools corresponding to the potential T-cell epitope Env (A), Gag (B), and Pol (C) sets. Median responses at each time point are indicated with a solid line, and the dashed line indicates the positive threshold of 55 spot-forming cells (SFCs) per 106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Arrows indicate the injection time points. Statistical significance was determined by the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. All subjects were either naive to a prior human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine or had received 2 or 3 doses of a prototype HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) containing only an EnvA insert. See Methods for descriptions of group 1, group 2, and placebo recipients.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cellular immune responses measured by intracellular cytokine staining. The percentage of CD4+ T cells (A, C, and E) and CD8+ T cells (B, D, and F) producing interleukin 2 and or interferon γ in response to stimulation with potential T-cell epitope Env (A and B), Gag Mos1 (C and D), and Gag Mos2 (E and F) peptide pools are shown. Median responses at each time point are indicated with a solid line, and the dashed line indicates the lower limit of detection of the assay. Arrows indicate the injection time points. All subjects were either naive to a prior human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine or had received 2 or 3 doses of a prototype HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) containing only an EnvA insert. See Methods for descriptions of group 1, group 2, and placebo recipients.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Humoral immune responses measured against EnvA (A), EnvB (B), EnvC (C), and Mos1 Env (D) by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Median responses at each time point are indicated with a solid line and the dashed line indicates the lower limit of detection of the assay. Arrows indicate the injection time points. Statistical significance was determined by the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. All subjects were either naive to a prior human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine or had received 2 or 3 doses of a prototype HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) containing only an EnvA insert. See Methods for descriptions of group 1, group 2, and placebo recipients.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Neutralizing antibody activity was measured using pseudoviruses expressing Env derived from tier 1A viruses MN3 (clade B; A), SF162 (clade B; B), and MW965 (clade C; C). Median responses at each time point are indicated with a solid line, and the dashed line indicates the lower limit of detection of the assay. Arrows indicate the injection time points. All subjects were either naive to a prior human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine or had received 2 or 3 doses of a prototype HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) containing only an EnvA insert. See Methods for descriptions of group 1, group 2, and placebo recipients.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Env binding antibodies as measured by surface plasmon resonance. Binding antibodies were measured against the cyclic V2 loop (A) and the cyclic V3 loop (B) peptides of 92TH023 (clade AE). Median responses at each time point are indicated with a solid line. Arrows indicate the injection time points. All subjects were either naive to a prior human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine or had received 2 or 3 doses of a prototype HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) containing only an EnvA insert. See Methods for descriptions of group 1, group 2, and placebo recipients.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis responses measured using beads coated with Env from clade A (A1.con; A), clade B (SF162; B), or clade C (1086C [C] or ZA [D]). Median responses at each time point are indicated with a solid line. Arrows indicate the injection time points. Statistical significance was determined by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. All subjects were either naive to a prior human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine or had received 2 or 3 doses of a prototype HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) containing only an EnvA insert. See Methods for descriptions of group 1, group 2, and placebo recipients.

References

    1. Buchbinder SP, Mehrotra DV, Duerr A, et al. Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial. Lancet 2008; 372:1881–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flynn NM, Forthal DN, Harro CD, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine to prevent HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis 2005; 191:654–65. - PubMed
    1. McElrath MJ, De Rosa SC, Moodie Z, et al. HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept step study: a case-cohort analysis. Lancet 2008; 372:1894–905. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, et al. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2209–20. - PubMed
    1. Hammer SM, Sobieszczyk ME, Janes H, et al. Efficacy trial of a DNA/rAd5 HIV-1 preventive vaccine. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:2083–92. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data