Genetic parameters for reproductive traits at different parities in Large White pigs
- PMID: 29669077
- PMCID: PMC6140927
- DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky066
Genetic parameters for reproductive traits at different parities in Large White pigs
Abstract
Univariate or bivariate animal models were used to estimate the variance components and co-variance components for eight reproductive traits: total number born (TNB), number born alive (NBA), total litter weight of piglets born alive (BALWT), number of healthy births (NHB), number of weak births (NWB), number of deformed fetuses (NDF), number of stillborn (NSB), and number of mummified pigs (MUMM). In addition, the phenotypic and genetic correlations between traits at different parities were also estimated. The results showed that the heritabilities of the eight reproductive traits were lower than 0.10. Genetic correlations between NHB and TNB, NBA, or BALWT were 0.68, 0.84 and 0.89 respectively; whereas genetic correlations between NHB and NWB, NDF, NSB or MUMM were negative or close to 0, ranging from -0.28 to 0.13. NHB was relatively identified as an ideal informative trait for selection for improved reproduction. Furthermore, genetic correlations between different parities for all traits, except for NDF were strongly positive, showing that it was reasonable to consider different parities as the same trait. For NDF, genetic correlations between the first and the other parities were low, indicating that it was probably unreasonable to cull pigs according to the NDF at first parity. Optimum reproductive traits were observed at the third parity, and reinforcing the management of sows in the first and > 4 parities can be a practical method for improving reproductive traits.
Similar articles
-
Genetic parameters for litter traits at different parities in purebred Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.Anim Sci J. 2019 Dec;90(12):1497-1502. doi: 10.1111/asj.13298. Epub 2019 Oct 11. Anim Sci J. 2019. PMID: 31603600
-
Effect of RNF4-SacII gene polymorphism on reproductive traits of Landrace × Large White crossbred sows.Reprod Domest Anim. 2020 Oct;55(10):1286-1293. doi: 10.1111/rda.13703. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Reprod Domest Anim. 2020. PMID: 32416617
-
Genetic parameter estimation for number born alive at different parities in Landrace and Large White pigs.Anim Sci J. 2019 Sep;90(9):1111-1119. doi: 10.1111/asj.13252. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Anim Sci J. 2019. PMID: 31270928
-
Survey of SNPs Associated with Total Number Born and Total Number Born Alive in Pig.Genes (Basel). 2020 Apr 30;11(5):491. doi: 10.3390/genes11050491. Genes (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32365801 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Importance and variability of the paternal component in sow reproductive traits.J Appl Genet. 2024 Dec;65(4):853-866. doi: 10.1007/s13353-024-00910-y. Epub 2024 Oct 18. J Appl Genet. 2024. PMID: 39422876 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Genomic prediction accounting for dominance and epistatic genetic effects on litter size traits in Large White pigs.J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103:skaf004. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf004. J Anim Sci. 2025. PMID: 39774780
-
Genome Selection and Genome-Wide Association Analyses for Litter Size Traits in Large White Pigs.Animals (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;15(12):1724. doi: 10.3390/ani15121724. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40564276 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of IGFBP2 gene polymorphism and association of genotypes with performance traits in Large White Yorkshire pigs.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025 Jun 25;57(6):286. doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04539-9. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025. PMID: 40555891
-
Heterozygosity and homozygosity regions affect reproductive success and the loss of reproduction: A case study with litter traits in pigs.Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Jul 26;20:4060-4071. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.039. eCollection 2022. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022. PMID: 35983229 Free PMC article.
-
Statistical Analysis of Reproductive Traits in Jinwu Pig and Identification of Genome-Wide Association Loci.Genes (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;16(5):550. doi: 10.3390/genes16050550. Genes (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40428373 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Belstra B. A. 2003. Parity associated changes in reproductive performance: physiological basis or record keeping artifact? (Online). https://projects.ncsu.edu/project/swine_extension/swinereports/2003/bels... (Accessed 5 March 2018).
-
- Canario L., Cantoni E., Le Bihan E., Caritez J. C., Billon Y., Bidanel J. P., and Foulley J. L.. 2006. Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 84:3185–3196. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-775. - PubMed
-
- Crovetti A., Bozzi R., Pugliese C., and Acciaioli A.. 2010. Genetic parameters of productive and reproductive traits in Cinta Senese pig. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 4:82–84. doi:10.4081/ijas.2005.2s.82.
-
- Darfour-Oduro K. A., Naazie A., Ahunu B. K., and Aboagye G. S.. 2009. Genetic parameter estimates of growth traits of indigenous pigs in Northern Ghana. Livestock Sci. 125:187–191. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.04.007.
-
- Ehat H., Knol E. F., and Jwm M.. 2001. Estimates of genetic parameters for reproduction traits at different parities in Dutch Landrace pigs. Livestock Prod. Sci. 69:179–186. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00258-X.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources