Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 7;13(5):718-725.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.13471217. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

Survey of Kidney Biopsy Clinical Practice and Training in the United States

Affiliations

Survey of Kidney Biopsy Clinical Practice and Training in the United States

Christina M Yuan et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Practicing clinical nephrologists are performing fewer diagnostic kidney biopsies. Requiring biopsy procedural competence for graduating nephrology fellows is controversial.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: An anonymous, on-line survey of all Walter Reed training program graduates (n=82; 1985-2017) and all United States nephrology program directors (n=149; August to October of 2017), regarding kidney biopsy practice and training, was undertaken.

Results: Walter Reed graduates' response and completion rates were 71% and 98%, respectively. The majority felt adequately trained in native kidney biopsy (83%), transplant biopsy (82%), and tissue interpretation (78%), with no difference for ≤10 versus >10 practice years. Thirty-five percent continued to perform biopsies (13% did ≥10 native biopsies/year); 93% referred at least some biopsies. The most common barriers to performing biopsy were logistics (81%) and time (74%). Program director response and completion rates were 60% and 77%. Seventy-two percent cited ≥1 barrier to fellow competence. The most common barriers were logistics (45%), time (45%), and likelihood that biopsy would not be performed postgraduation (41%). Fifty-one percent indicated that fellows should not be required to demonstrate minimal procedural competence in biopsy, although 97% agreed that fellows should demonstrate competence in knowing/managing indications, contraindications, and complications. Program directors citing ≥1 barrier or whose fellows did <50 native biopsies/year in total were more likely to think that procedural competence should not be required versus those citing no barriers (P=0.02), or whose fellows performed ≥50 biopsies (P<0.01).

Conclusions: Almost two-thirds of graduate respondents from a single military training program no longer perform biopsy, and 51% of responding nephrology program directors indicated that biopsy procedural competence should not be required. These findings should inform discussion of kidney biopsy curriculum requirements.

Keywords: Biopsy; Contraindications; Curriculum; Fellowships and Scholarships; Interventional Radiology; Military Personnel; Nephrologists; Nephrology Education; Nephrology Fellowship; Program Directors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thinking; Transplants; United States; kidney biopsy; nephrology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Walter Reed graduate opinions regarding kidney biopsy (1985–2017). (A) Reasons for continuing to perform kidney biopsy (n=19). (B) Barriers to performing kidney biopsy (n=54). Adeq, adequate; Post-Bx, post-biopsy; RVU, relative value units.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Number of native kidney biopsies performed by fellows and available to institution (done institution-wide) in training year 2016–2017. Program director respondents n=70; median number of clinical fellows/program=6. TY, training year.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Required minimum number of native biopsies performed and desirable minimum number to demonstrate fellow competence (program director respondents n=69).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Barriers to achieving fellow competence in performing kidney biopsy (program director respondents n=69). BX, biopsy; IN, interventional nephrology; IR, interventional radiology.

Comment in

References

    1. Clark E, Barsuk JH, Karpinski J, McQuillan R: Achieving procedural competence during nephrology fellowship training: Current requirements and educational research. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11: 2244–2249, 2016 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pivert K: ASN data brief: Nephrology procedures in GME (results of a FlashPoll). ASN data analytics, 2017. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315065568_ASN_Data_Brief_Nephro.... Accessed February 24, 2018
    1. Basu A, Rope R: Mandating procedural competency in nephrology fellowship: Necessary or a loss of time? ASN kidney news, 2017. Available at https://www.kidneynews.org/kidneynews/9_3/16/16.pdf. Accessed February 24, 2018
    1. Berns JS, O’Neill WC: Performance of procedures by nephrologists and nephrology fellows at U.S. nephrology training programs. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 941–947, 2008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sachdeva M, Ross DW, Shah HH: Renal ultrasound, dialysis catheter placement, and kidney biopsy experience of US nephrology fellows. Am J Kidney Dis 68: 187–192, 2016 - PubMed