Survey of Kidney Biopsy Clinical Practice and Training in the United States
- PMID: 29669819
- PMCID: PMC5968891
- DOI: 10.2215/CJN.13471217
Survey of Kidney Biopsy Clinical Practice and Training in the United States
Abstract
Background and objectives: Practicing clinical nephrologists are performing fewer diagnostic kidney biopsies. Requiring biopsy procedural competence for graduating nephrology fellows is controversial.
Design, setting, participants, & measurements: An anonymous, on-line survey of all Walter Reed training program graduates (n=82; 1985-2017) and all United States nephrology program directors (n=149; August to October of 2017), regarding kidney biopsy practice and training, was undertaken.
Results: Walter Reed graduates' response and completion rates were 71% and 98%, respectively. The majority felt adequately trained in native kidney biopsy (83%), transplant biopsy (82%), and tissue interpretation (78%), with no difference for ≤10 versus >10 practice years. Thirty-five percent continued to perform biopsies (13% did ≥10 native biopsies/year); 93% referred at least some biopsies. The most common barriers to performing biopsy were logistics (81%) and time (74%). Program director response and completion rates were 60% and 77%. Seventy-two percent cited ≥1 barrier to fellow competence. The most common barriers were logistics (45%), time (45%), and likelihood that biopsy would not be performed postgraduation (41%). Fifty-one percent indicated that fellows should not be required to demonstrate minimal procedural competence in biopsy, although 97% agreed that fellows should demonstrate competence in knowing/managing indications, contraindications, and complications. Program directors citing ≥1 barrier or whose fellows did <50 native biopsies/year in total were more likely to think that procedural competence should not be required versus those citing no barriers (P=0.02), or whose fellows performed ≥50 biopsies (P<0.01).
Conclusions: Almost two-thirds of graduate respondents from a single military training program no longer perform biopsy, and 51% of responding nephrology program directors indicated that biopsy procedural competence should not be required. These findings should inform discussion of kidney biopsy curriculum requirements.
Keywords: Biopsy; Contraindications; Curriculum; Fellowships and Scholarships; Interventional Radiology; Military Personnel; Nephrologists; Nephrology Education; Nephrology Fellowship; Program Directors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thinking; Transplants; United States; kidney biopsy; nephrology.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Nephrology.
Figures
Comment in
-
Does the Kidney Biopsy Portend the Future of Nephrology?Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 May 7;13(5):681-682. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03380318. Epub 2018 Apr 18. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 29669817 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Pivert K: ASN data brief: Nephrology procedures in GME (results of a FlashPoll). ASN data analytics, 2017. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315065568_ASN_Data_Brief_Nephro.... Accessed February 24, 2018
-
- Basu A, Rope R: Mandating procedural competency in nephrology fellowship: Necessary or a loss of time? ASN kidney news, 2017. Available at https://www.kidneynews.org/kidneynews/9_3/16/16.pdf. Accessed February 24, 2018
-
- Sachdeva M, Ross DW, Shah HH: Renal ultrasound, dialysis catheter placement, and kidney biopsy experience of US nephrology fellows. Am J Kidney Dis 68: 187–192, 2016 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
