Does Discrimination Explain High Risk of Depression among High-Income African American Men?
- PMID: 29671796
- PMCID: PMC5946099
- DOI: 10.3390/bs8040040
Does Discrimination Explain High Risk of Depression among High-Income African American Men?
Abstract
Background: Higher socioeconomic status is known to decrease the risk for poor mental health overall. However, African American males of higher socioeconomic status (SES) are at an increased risk for having a major depressive episode (MDE). It is not known whether perceived discrimination (PD) explains this risk. The current study used nationally representative data to explore the role of PD in explaining the association between high-SES and having MDE among African American men. Methods: The National Survey of American Life (NSAL), 2003, included 4461 American adults including 1271 African American men. SES indicators (i.e., household income, educational attainment, employment status, and marital status) were the independent variables. 12-month MDE measured using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) was the outcome. Age, gender, and region were the covariates. PD was the potential mediator. For data analysis, we used logistic regression. Results: Among African American men, household income was positively associated with odds of 12-month MDE. The positive association between household income and odds of MDE remained unchanged after adding PD to the model, suggesting that PD may not explain why high-income African American men are at a higher risk of MDE. Conclusions: Perceived discrimination does not explain the increased risk for depression among African American males of higher SES. Future research should explore the role of other potential mechanisms such as stress, coping, social isolation, and/or negative social interaction that may increase psychological costs of upward social mobility for African American males.
Keywords: African Americans; Blacks; depression; discrimination; gender; socioeconomic position; socioeconomic status.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Stringhini S., Berkman L., Dugravot A., Ferrie J.E., Marmot M., Kivimaki M., Singh-Manoux A. Socioeconomic status, structural and functional measures of social support, and mortality: The British Whitehall II Cohort Study, 1985–2009. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012;175:1275–1283. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr461. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stringhini S., Batty G.D., Bovet P., Shipley M.J., Marmot M.G., Kumari M., Tabak A.G., Kivimäki M. Association of lifecourse socioeconomic status with chronic inflammation and type 2 diabetes risk: The Whitehall II prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001479. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stringhini S., Dugravot A., Shipley M., Goldberg M., Zins M., Kivimäki M., Marmot M., Sabia S., Singh-Manoux A. Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: Further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts. PLoS Med. 2011 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000419. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
