Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May;32(3):1241-1252.
doi: 10.1111/jvim.15135. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

A review of mycoplasma diagnostics in cattle

Affiliations
Review

A review of mycoplasma diagnostics in cattle

Alysia M Parker et al. J Vet Intern Med. 2018 May.

Abstract

Mycoplasma species have a global distribution causing serious diseases in cattle worldwide including mastitis, arthritis, pneumonia, otitis media and reproductive disorders. Mycoplasma species are typically highly contagious, are capable of causing severe disease, and are difficult infections to resolve requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis to prevent and control disease outbreaks. This review discusses the development and use of different diagnostic methods to identify Mycoplasma species relevant to cattle, with a particular focus on Mycoplasma bovis. Traditionally, the identification and diagnosis of mycoplasma has been performed via microbial culture. More recently, the use of polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycoplasma species from various bovine samples has increased. Polymerase chain reaction has a higher efficiency, specificity, and sensitivity for laboratory diagnosis when compared with conventional culture-based methods. Several tools are now available for typing Mycoplasma spp. isolates, allowing for genetic characterization in disease outbreak investigations. Serological diagnosis through the use of indirect ELISA allows the detection of antimycoplasma antibodies in sera and milk, with their use demonstrated on individual animal samples as well as BTM samples. While each testing method has strengths and limitations, their combined use provides complementary information, which when interpreted in conjunction with clinical signs and herd history, facilitates pathogen detection, and characterization of the disease status of cattle populations.

Keywords: ELISA; PCR; culture; mastitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parte A, Krieg NR, Ludwig W. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011.
    1. Nocard M, Roux M, Borrel M, et al. The Microbe of Pleuropneumonia. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12:354–358. - PubMed
    1. Dupuy V, Manso‐Silvan L, Barbe V, et al. Evolutionary history of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia using next generation sequencing of mycoplasma mycoides subsp mycoides “small colony''. Plos One 2012;7:e46821. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox LK. Mycoplasma mastitis: causes, transmission, and control. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012;28:225–237. - PubMed
    1. Hale HH, Helmboldt CF, Plastridge WN, Stula EF. Bovine mastitis caused by Mycoplasma species. Cornell Vet. 1962;52:582–591. - PubMed