Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;54(9):987-996.
doi: 10.1111/jpc.13923. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

Measuring the financial and productivity burden of paediatric hospitalisation on the wider family network

Affiliations

Measuring the financial and productivity burden of paediatric hospitalisation on the wider family network

Virginia Mumford et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: To estimate the non-medical out-of-pocket costs for families with a child in hospital.

Methods: This study was a survey of 225 parents of paediatric inpatients on nine wards of an Australian public paediatric teaching hospital on two separate days. Our primary outcomes were the costs associated with: (i) time taken off work to care for the child in hospital; (ii) time off work or contributed by family and friends to care for other dependents; and (iii) travel, meals, accommodation and incidental expenses during the child's stay. Demographic data included postcode (to assess distance, socio-economic status and remoteness), child's age, ward and whether this was their child's first admission.

Results: Mean patient age was 6.5 years (standard deviation 5.2). On an average per patient day basis, parents took 1.12 days off work and spent 0.61 (standard deviation 0.53) nights away from home, with 83.8% of nights away at the child's bedside. Parents spent Australian dollars (AUD)89 per day on travel and AUD36 on meals and accommodation. Total costs (including productivity costs) were AUD589 per patient day. Higher costs per patient day were correlated with living in a more remote area (0.48) and a greater travel distance to the hospital (0.41). A higher number of days off work was correlated (0.69) with number of school days missed.

Conclusion: These results demonstrate the considerable time and financial resources expended by families caring for a child in hospital and are important inputs in evaluating health-care interventions that affect risk of hospitalisation and length of stay in paediatric care.

Keywords: hospital care; non-medical costs; out-of-pocket costs; paediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survey questions.

References

    1. Griebsch I, Coast J, Brown J. Quality‐adjusted life‐years lack quality in pediatric care: A critical review of published cost‐utility studies in child health. Pediatrics 2005; 115: e600–14. - PubMed
    1. Ungar WJ. Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 2011; 29: 641–52. - PubMed
    1. Furber G, Segal L. The validity of the child health utility instrument (CHU9D) as a routine outcome measure for use in child and adolescent mental health services. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2015; 13: 22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ygge BM, Arnetz JE. A study of parental involvement in pediatric hospital care: Implications for clinical practice. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2004; 19: 217–23. - PubMed
    1. Hill MK, Pawsey M, Cutler A, Holt JL, Goldfeld SR. Consensus standards for the care of children and adolescents in Australian health services. Med. J. Aust. 2011; 194: 78–82. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources