Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jul;111(7):240-252.
doi: 10.1177/0141076818769477. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jeremy Howick  1 , Andrew Moscrop  1 , Alexander Mebius  1 , Thomas R Fanshawe  1 , George Lewith  2 , Felicity L Bishop  2 , Patriek Mistiaen  3 , Nia W Roberts  4 , Eglė Dieninytė  5 , Xiao-Yang Hu  2 , Paul Aveyard  1 , Igho J Onakpoya  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jeremy Howick et al. J R Soc Med. 2018 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Errata.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J R Soc Med. 2018 Oct;111(10):383. doi: 10.1177/0141076818809015. Epub 2018 Oct 15. J R Soc Med. 2018. PMID: 31329672 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background Practitioners who enhance how they express empathy and create positive expectations of benefit could improve patient outcomes. However, the evidence in this area has not been recently synthesised. Objective To estimate the effects of empathy and expectations interventions for any clinical condition. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Data sources Six databases from inception to August 2017. Study selection Randomised trials of empathy or expectations interventions in any clinical setting with patients aged 12 years or older. Review methods Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and graded quality of evidence using GRADE. Random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Results We identified 28 eligible (n = 6017). In seven trials, empathic consultations improved pain, anxiety and satisfaction by a small amount (standardised mean difference -0.18 [95% confidence interval -0.32 to -0.03]). Twenty-two trials tested the effects of positive expectations. Eighteen of these (n = 2014) reported psychological outcomes (mostly pain) and showed a modest benefit (standardised mean difference -0.43 [95% confidence interval -0.65 to -0.21]); 11 (n = 1790) reported physical outcomes (including bronchial function/ length of hospital stay) and showed a small benefit (standardised mean difference -0.18 [95% confidence interval -0.32 to -0.05]). Within 11 trials (n = 2706) assessing harms, there was no evidence of adverse effects (odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.63). The risk of bias was low. The main limitations were difficulties in blinding and high heterogeneity for some comparisons. Conclusions Greater practitioner empathy or communication of positive messages can have small patient benefits for a range of clinical conditions, especially pain. Protocol registration Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (protocol) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011934.pub2.

Keywords: Communication; evidence-based practice; family medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effects of empathy interventions.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effects of expectations interventions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vermani M, Marcus M, Katzman MA. Rates of detection of mood and anxiety disorders in primary care: a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Primary Care Companion CNS Disord 2011; 13: e1–e10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, Jorgenson S, Sadigh G, Sikorskii A, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12: CD003267–CD003267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care 2009; 47: 826–834. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e001570–e001570. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore PJ, Adler NE, Robertson PA. Medical malpractice: the effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice intentions. West J Med 2000; 173: 244–250. - PMC - PubMed