Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0196052.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196052. eCollection 2018.

Trypanosomatid parasites in Austrian mosquitoes

Affiliations

Trypanosomatid parasites in Austrian mosquitoes

Ellen Schoener et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Trypanosomatid flagellates have not been studied in Austria in any detail. In this study, specific nested PCR, targeted on the ribosomal small subunit, was used to determine the occurrence and diversity of trypanosomatids in wild-caught mosquitoes sampled across Eastern Austria in the years 2014-2015. We collected a total of 29,975 mosquitoes of 19 species divided in 1680 pools. Of these, 298 (17.7%), representing 12 different mosquito species, were positive for trypanosomatid DNA. In total, seven trypanosomatid spp. were identified (three Trypanosoma, three Crithidia and one Herpetomonas species), with the highest parasite species diversity found in the mosquito host Coquillettidia richiardii. The most frequent parasite species belonged to the mammalian Trypanosoma theileri/cervi species complex (found in 105 pools; 6.3%). The avian species T. culicavium (found in 69 pools; 4.1%) was only detected in mosquitoes of the genus Culex, which corresponds to their preference for avian hosts. Monoxenous trypanosomatids of the genus Crithidia and Herpetomonas were found in 20 (1.3%) mosquito pools. One third (n = 98) of the trypanosomatid positive mosquito pools carried more than one parasite species. This is the first large scale study of trypanosomatid parasites in Austrian mosquitoes and our results are valuable in providing an overview of the diversity of these parasites in Austria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. An SSU rDNA-based Bayesian phylogenetic tree representing the most likely new Herpetomonas species obtained from a mosquito collected in Eastern Austria.
Bootstrap values from Bayesian posterior probabilities (5 million generations) and bootstrap percentages for maximum-likelihood (PhyML) analysis (1,000 replicates) are shown at the nodes; dashes indicate <50% bootstrap support or different topology; asterisks mark branches with maximal statistical support; double-crossed branches are 50% of the original length. The tree was rooted with five sequences of Phytomonas spp., the closest relative of the genus Herpetomonas. Parasite names, names of strains or GenBank accession numbers are given; the branch lengths are drawn proportionally to the amount of changes (scale bar).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Number of mosquito pools positive for trypanosomatid DNA (trypanosome species, T. avium, T. culicavium, and T. theileri, are shown separately while Crithidia spp. infections are combined) according to the sampled months in 2014 and 2015 (Vienna and Eastern Austria).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Prevalence of trypanosomatids calculated as minimum infection rate (MIR) (trypanosome species are shown separately while Crithidia spp. infections are combined) in mosquitoes according to the sampled months in 2014 and 2015 (Vienna and Eastern Austria).

References

    1. Maslov DA, Votýpka J, Yurchenko V, Lukeš J. Diversity and phylogeny of insect trypanosomatids: all that is hidden shall be revealed. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29(1):43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2012.11.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simpson AG, Stevens JR, Lukeš J. The evolution and diversity of kinetoplastid flagellates. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22(4):168–74. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaufer A, Ellis J, Stark D, Barratt J. The evolution of trypanosomatid taxonomy. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:287 doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2204-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lukeš J, Skalický T, Týč J, Votýpka J, Yurchenko V. Evolution of parasitism in kinetoplastid flagellates. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2014;195(2):115–22. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.05.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poinar G Jr, Poinar R. Evidence of vector-borne disease of early cretaceous reptiles. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004;4(4):281–4. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2004.4.281 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types