Infections and associated costs following cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantations: a nationwide cohort study
- PMID: 29672690
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux387
Infections and associated costs following cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantations: a nationwide cohort study
Abstract
Aims: This study assessed the contemporary occurrence of cardiac device infections (CDIs) following implantation in French hospitals and estimated associated costs.
Methods and results: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the French National Hospital Database (PMSI). Patients with a record of de novo cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation or replacement interventions in France in 2012 were identified and followed until the end of 2015. Cardiac device infections (CDIs) were identified based on coding using the French classification for procedures [Classification Commune des Actes Médicaux (CCAM)] and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Associated costs were estimated based on direct costs from the perspective of the French social security system. In total 78 267 CIED patients (72% de novo implants) were identified (15% defibrillators; 84% pacemakers). The 36-month infection rate associated with de novo defibrillator-only implants, as well as for cardiac resynchronisation therapy - defibrillators (CRT-Ds) was 1.6%. The CDI risk was 2.9% and 3.9% for replacement ICDs and CRT-Ds. Infection rates were lower for de novo single-chamber pacemaker (SCP)/dual-chamber pacemaker (DCP) (0.5%) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy - pacemaker (CRT-P) implants (1.0%), while for replacement procedures the risk increased to 1.4% (SCP/DCP) and 1.3% (CRT-P). Mean infection-related costs over 24 months were €20 623 and €23 234 for CDIs associated with replacement and de novo procedures, and overall costs were not significantly different between pacemaker and defibrillator patients.
Conclusion: Cardiac device infections in France are associated with substantial costs, when considering inpatient hospitalizations. Strategies to minimize the rate of CIED infection should be a priority for health care providers and payers.
Comment in
-
The struggle against infections of cardiac implantable electrical devices: the burden of costs requires new personalized solutions.Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):1877-1879. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy049. Europace. 2018. PMID: 29672698 No abstract available.
-
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection: time to discuss reimbursement-Authors' reply.Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):2046. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy196. Europace. 2018. PMID: 30239663 No abstract available.
-
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection: time to discuss reimbursement.Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):2045-2046. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy187. Europace. 2018. PMID: 30239674 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Infective endocarditis and risk of death after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a nationwide cohort study.Europace. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):1007-1014. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw404. Europace. 2017. PMID: 28073883
-
Implantation and patient profiles for pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators in France (2008-2009).Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 May;104(5):332-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011. PMID: 21693370
-
Incidence and Costs Related to Lead Damage Occurring Within the First Year After a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Replacement Procedure.J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 12;5(2):e002813. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002813. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID: 26873688 Free PMC article.
-
Device infections in implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus permanent pacemakers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;30(7):1053-1065. doi: 10.1111/jce.13932. Epub 2019 Apr 17. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 30938929
-
A Systematic Review of Short-Term Outcomes of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation After Transvenous Lead Removal of Infected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device.Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;203:444-450. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.071. Epub 2023 Aug 3. Am J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37542954
Cited by
-
New advances in management and treatment of cardiac implantable electronic devices infections.Infection. 2024 Apr;52(2):323-336. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02130-8. Epub 2023 Nov 24. Infection. 2024. PMID: 37996646 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Hybrid Approach of Simultaneous Extraction and Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in a Transvenous Lead Endocarditis Case.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Feb 27;120(2):e20220091. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220091. eCollection 2023. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36856236 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese. No abstract available.
-
Chronic kidney disease and transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device infection-is there an impact on healthcare utilization, costs, disease progression, and mortality?Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7):euae169. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae169. Europace. 2024. PMID: 38890126 Free PMC article.
-
Leadless Pacemaker Infection Risk in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: A Case Series and Literature Review.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 8;12(24):7573. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247573. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137641 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection on bradyarrhythmia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 2;104(18):e41779. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041779. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 40324250 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous