Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina: A Single-Center Experience
- PMID: 29673511
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.251
Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina: A Single-Center Experience
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients presenting with refractory angina.
Background: The coronary sinus Reducer is a novel device to aid in the management of patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable to further revascularization.
Methods: Fifty patients with refractory angina and objective evidence of myocardial ischemia who were judged unsuitable for revascularization were treated with coronary sinus Reducer implantation at a single center between March 2015 and August 2016. Safety endpoints were procedural success and the absence of device-related adverse events. Efficacy endpoints, assessed at 4- and 12-month follow-up, were a reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, improvement in quality of life assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, improvement in exercise tolerance assessed using the 6-min walk test, and reduction in pharmacological antianginal therapy.
Results: Procedural success was achieved in all patients, with no device-related adverse effects during the procedure or at follow-up. Regarding the efficacy endpoint, 40 patients (80%) had at least 1 reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class, and 20 patients (40%) had at least 2 class reductions, with a mean class reduction to 1.67 ± 0.83 vs. 2.98 ± 0.52 (p < 0.001) at 4-month follow-up. All Seattle Angina Questionnaire items improved significantly (p < 0.001 for all). A significant increment in 6-min walk distance to 388.6 ± 119.7 m vs. 287.0 ± 138.9 m (p = 0.004) was observed. Sixteen patients (32%) and 3 patients (6%) demonstrated reductions of at least 1 or 2 antianginal drugs, respectively. The benefit of Reducer implantation observed at 4-month follow-up was maintained at 1 year.
Conclusions: In this real-world, single-center experience, implantation of the coronary sinus Reducer appeared safe and was associated with reduction in anginal symptoms and improvement in quality of life in patients with refractory angina who were not candidates for further revascularization.
Keywords: chronic refractory angina; coronary sinus reducer; optimal medical therapy.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
New Treatment Options for the "No Option" Patient With Refractory Angina.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):793-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.023. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29673512 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation: Potential New Horizons Where it Should Be Tested.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1658-1659. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.044. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30139473 No abstract available.
-
Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation: Potential New Horizons Where it Should Be Tested.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.018. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30139474 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of the reducer: A multi-center clinical registry - REDUCE study.Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.116. Epub 2018 Jun 30. Int J Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29983248
-
Coronary Sinus Narrowing for Treating Refractory Angina: REDUCER-I Multicenter "Real-World" Observational Study Primary Endpoint Analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Dec 23;17(24):2908-2918. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.047. Epub 2024 Nov 6. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 39520437
-
Coronary sinus Reducer device for the treatment of refractory angina: A multicenter initial experience.Rev Port Cardiol. 2023 May;42(5):413-420. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2022.05.010. Epub 2023 Feb 22. Rev Port Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36828185 English, Portuguese.
-
The efficacy of coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina-A systematic review of the literature.J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Dec;31(6):775-779. doi: 10.1111/joic.12560. Epub 2018 Sep 7. J Interv Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30191622
-
Safety, Efficacy, and Effectiveness of Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation in Refractory Angina: A Meta-Analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug 11;18(15):1864-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.06.012. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40803761
Cited by
-
Refractory angina pectoris: a 20-year (2003-2022) bibliometric analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 24;10:1228201. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1228201. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37692051 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Sinus Reducer in the Therapy of Refractory Angina Pectoris-Mid-Term Results of the Real-Life Cohort.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 28;13(15):4413. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154413. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124680 Free PMC article.
-
INOCA/ANOCA: Mechanisms and novel treatments.Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Jun;30:100302. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100302. Epub 2023 May 12. Am Heart J Plus. 2023. PMID: 37377840 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation - A multicenter study.Clin Cardiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):424-428. doi: 10.1002/clc.23566. Epub 2021 Feb 19. Clin Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33605473 Free PMC article.
-
Coronary sinus for cardiac resynchronization therapy: leave it alone and go for the branch! a case report.Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022 Nov 5;6(11):ytac436. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac436. eCollection 2022 Nov. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022. PMID: 36405535 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical