Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun:12:62-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

Profiling of G protein-coupled receptors in vagal afferents reveals novel gut-to-brain sensing mechanisms

Affiliations

Profiling of G protein-coupled receptors in vagal afferents reveals novel gut-to-brain sensing mechanisms

Kristoffer L Egerod et al. Mol Metab. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) act as transmembrane molecular sensors of neurotransmitters, hormones, nutrients, and metabolites. Because unmyelinated vagal afferents richly innervate the gastrointestinal mucosa, gut-derived molecules may directly modulate the activity of vagal afferents through GPCRs. However, the types of GPCRs expressed in vagal afferents are largely unknown. Here, we determined the expression profile of all GPCRs expressed in vagal afferents of the mouse, with a special emphasis on those innervating the gastrointestinal tract.

Methods: Using a combination of high-throughput quantitative PCR, RNA sequencing, and in situ hybridization, we systematically quantified GPCRs expressed in vagal unmyelinated Nav1.8-expressing afferents.

Results: GPCRs for gut hormones that were the most enriched in Nav1.8-expressing vagal unmyelinated afferents included NTSR1, NPY2R, CCK1R, and to a lesser extent, GLP1R, but not GHSR and GIPR. Interestingly, both GLP1R and NPY2R were coexpressed with CCK1R. In contrast, NTSR1 was coexpressed with GPR65, a marker preferentially enriched in intestinal mucosal afferents. Only few microbiome-derived metabolite sensors such as GPR35 and, to a lesser extent, GPR119 and CaSR were identified in the Nav1.8-expressing vagal afferents. GPCRs involved in lipid sensing and inflammation (e.g. CB1R, CYSLTR2, PTGER4), and neurotransmitters signaling (CHRM4, DRD2, CRHR2) were also highly enriched in Nav1.8-expressing neurons. Finally, we identified 21 orphan GPCRs with unknown functions in vagal afferents.

Conclusion: Overall, this study provides a comprehensive description of GPCR-dependent sensing mechanisms in vagal afferents, including novel coexpression patterns, and conceivably coaction of key receptors for gut-derived molecules involved in gut-brain communication.

Keywords: G protein-coupled receptors; GLP1R; Gut hormones; Gut-brain axis; NTSR1; Vagal afferent nerves.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gut hormone receptors expression and enrichment in NaV1.8-expressing vagal afferents. (A) Expression level of gut hormone receptors in vagal afferent (whole nodose ganglion) of wild-type (WT) mice, the dotted line indicates the median for GPCRs expression. (B) Volcano plot for the fold change of expression level for 408 GPCRs (gray dots) in NaV1.8 neurons ablated vs. control mice. Gut hormone receptors are shown in red with corresponding names, the size of the dots relate to the expression level prior of ablation. (C) In situ hybridization of selected gut hormone receptors (i; Cck1r, ii; Glp1r, iii; Npyr2 and iv; Ntsr1) in red vs. immunohistochemical detection of YFP in the nodose ganglion of NaV1.8 reporter mice (Nav1.8-Cre-ChR2-YFP) in green. Asterisks indicate representative NaV1.8 positive cells. Triangles and arrows indicate examples of gut hormone receptor positive cells and double positive cells, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Double chromogenic in situ hybridization for gut hormone receptors. A, C, E, and G in situ hybridization for Gpr65 in red vs. Cck1r, Glp1r, Npy2r, or Ntsr1 in blue. B, D, F in situ hybridization for Cck1r in red vs. Glp1r, Npy2r, orNtsr1 in blue. Asterisks indicate representative double-labeled cell profiles. Pie charts give the percentage of single positive cells (red or blue) and double positive cells (purple). Bright-field images were collected from the nodose ganglion of wild-type mice. Tissue was counterstained with hematoxylin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Metabolite receptors expression and enrichment in NaV1.8-expressing vagal afferents. (A) Expression level of metabolite receptors in vagal afferents (whole nodose ganglion) of wild-type (WT) mice. The dotted line indicates the median for GPCRs expression. (B) Volcano plot for the fold change of expression level, for 408 GPCRs (gray dots) in NaV1.8 neurons ablated vs. control mice. Metabolite receptors are shown in red with corresponding names, the size of the dots relate to the expression level prior of ablation. (C) in situ hybridization for Gpr35 in red vs Cck1r and Gpr65 in blue. Pie charts give the percentage of single positive cells (red or blue) and double positive cells (purple).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Lipid receptors expression and enrichment in NaV1.8-expressing vagal afferents. (A) Expression level of lipid receptors in vagal afferent (whole nodose ganglion) of WT mice, the dotted line indicates the median for GPCRs expression. (B) Volcano plot for the fold change of expression level for 408 GPCRs (gray dots) in NaV1.8 neurons ablated vs. control mice. Lipid receptors are shown in red with corresponding names, the size of the dots relate to the expression level prior of ablation. (C) In situ hybridization of selected lipid receptors (i; Cb1r, ii; Cysltr2, iii; Ptger4) in red vs. immunohistochemical detection of YFP in the nodose ganglion of NaV1.8 reporter mice (Nav1.8-Cre-ChR2-YFP) in green. Asterisks indicate representative NaV1.8 positive cells. Triangles and arrows indicate examples of lipid receptor positive cells and double positive cells, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Double chromogenic in situ hybridization of lipid receptors. A, C, and E in situ for Cck1r in red vs. Cysltr2, Ptger4, Cb1r in blue. B, D, and F in situ for Gpr65 (a marker for gastrointestinal mucosa) in red vs. Cysltr2, Ptger4, Cb1r in blue. Asterisks indicate representative double-labeled cell profiles. Pie charts give the percentage of single positive cells (red or blue) and double positive cells (purple). Bright-field images were collected from the nodose ganglion of wild-type mice. Tissue was counterstained with hematoxylin.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Orphan receptors expression and enrichment in NaV1.8-expressing vagal afferents. (A) Expression level of selected orphan receptors in vagal afferent (whole nodose ganglion) of wild-type (WT) mice. The dotted line indicates the median for GPCRs expression. (B) Volcano plot for the fold change of expression level for 408 GPCRs (gray dots) in NaV1.8 neurons ablated vs. control mice. Orphan receptors are shown in red with corresponding names, the size of the dots relate to the expression level prior of ablation. (C) In situ hybridization of selected orphan receptors (i; Gpr65 and ii; Gpr161) in red vs. immunohistochemical detection of YFP in the nodose ganglion of NaV1.8 reporter mice (Nav1.8-Cre-ChR2-YFP) in green. Asterisks indicate representative NaV1.8 positive cells. Triangles and arrows indicate examples of orphan receptor positive cells and double positive cells, respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Neurotransmitter receptors expression and enrichment in NaV1.8-expressing vagal afferents. (A) Expression level of selected neurotransmitter receptors in vagal afferent (whole nodose ganglion) of WT mice, the dotted line indicates the median for GPCRs expression. (B) Volcano plot for the fold change of expression level for 408 GPCRs (gray dots) in NaV1.8 neurons ablated vs. control mice. Neurotransmitter receptors are shown in red with corresponding names, the size of the dots relate to the expression level prior of ablation. (C) In situ hybridization of Drd2 in red vs. immunohistochemical detection of YFP in the nodose ganglion of NaV1.8 reporter mice (Nav1.8-Cre-ChR2-YFP) in green. Asterisks indicate NaV1.8 positive cells triangles indicate neurotransmitter receptor positive cells and arrows indicate double positive cells. (D) Double in situ hybridizations for-for Drd2 in blue vs. Gpr65 and Cck1r in red (i; iii) or for Chrm4 in blue vs. Gpr65 and Cck1r in red (ii; iv). Pie charts give the percentage of single positive cells (red and blue) and double positive (purple).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic overview of GPCRs enriched in gastrointestinal vagal afferents. This study identified several GPCRs preferentially enriched in unmyelinated vagal afferents (Nav1.8). Identified receptors encompassed a wide range of GPCRs families including receptors for neurotransmitters, metabolites, lipids, and gut peptides. We further inferred their localization in neurons projecting preferentially to either the gastrointestinal muscularis CCK1 and GLP-1 receptor expressing fibers or the mucosa GPR65 expressing fibers based on Williams and coworkers and our results. Strikingly, most receptors showed a relatively widespread distribution in both categories of neurons. Receptors in green (Gαs-coupled) and orange (Gαq-coupled) are anticipated to stimulate neuronal activity. Those in red (Gαi-coupled) are anticipated to inhibit neuronal activity. Nonetheless, the downstream signaling pathways of these receptors are not known with certainty in vagal afferents. Of note, only receptors found to be mostly highly enriched in unmyelinated vagal afferents are listed here. For the purpose of simplification, orphan receptors were not indicated. NTS, nucleus of the solitary tract.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Palay S.L., Karlin L.J. An electron microscopic study of the intestinal villus. I. The fasting animal. The Journal of Biophysical Biochemical Cytology. 1959;5(3):363–372. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ushiki T. Three-dimensional ultrastructure of the autonomic nerve terminals in the lamina propria mucosae of the rat large intestine. Archives of Histology Cytology. 1992;55(Suppl):87–94. - PubMed
    1. Furness J.B., Rivera L.R., Cho H.J., Bravo D.M., Callaghan B. The gut as a sensory organ. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2013;10(12):729–740. - PubMed
    1. Powley T.L., Spaulding R.A., Haglof S.A. Vagal afferent innervation of the proximal gastrointestinal tract mucosa: chemoreceptor and mechanoreceptor architecture. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2011;519(4):644–660. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gautron L., Sakata I., Udit S., Zigman J.M., Wood J.N., Elmquist J.K. Genetic tracing of Nav1.8-expressing vagal afferents in the mouse. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2011;519(15):3085–3101. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances