Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr 5:9:693.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00693. eCollection 2018.

Impact of Paneth Cell Autophagy on Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Affiliations
Review

Impact of Paneth Cell Autophagy on Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Shu-Ling Wang et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Intestinal mucosal barrier, mainly consisting of the mucus layer and epithelium, functions in absorbing nutrition as well as prevention of the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms. Paneth cell, an important component of mucosal barrier, plays a vital role in maintaining the intestinal homeostasis by producing antimicrobial materials and controlling the host-commensal balance. Current evidence shows that the dysfunction of intestinal mucosal barrier, especially Paneth cell, participates in the onset and progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Autophagy, a cellular stress response, involves various physiological processes, such as secretion of proteins, production of antimicrobial peptides, and degradation of aberrant organelles or proteins. In the recent years, the roles of autophagy in the pathogenesis of IBD have been increasingly studied. Here in this review, we mainly focus on describing the roles of Paneth cell autophagy in IBD as well as several popular autophagy-related genetic variants in Penath cell and the related therapeutic strategies against IBD.

Keywords: Paneth cell; autophagy; endoplasmic reticulum stress; inflammatory bowel disease; unfolded protein response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of roles of intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) autophagy in the prevention of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Autophagy process in IECs is induced under inflammation- or immune-related challenge by the formation of the double-membrane autophagosomes. The integrity of autophagosomes and lysosomes leads to the formation of the single-membrane autolysosomes, functioning in degrading and recycling misfolded proteins, or dysfunctional organelles, thus contributing to cellular protection. The Class III-PI3K-Beclin-1 signaling pathway, led to the formation of Class III complex (Beclin-1-Atg14-vacuolar protein sorting(VPS)15-VPS34 complex) is the major inductive pathway to autophagy process, while the Class I-PI3K-mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway led to the inhibitory effects on autophagy process. The induction of autophagy protects IECs under stress through the degradation of various kinds of the damage-associated molecular pattern molecules and suppression of stress reaction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic illustration of mechanisms of Paneth cell autophagy related to endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in inflammatory bowel disease alleviation. Under the challenge of stresses, the triggering of the self-protected unfolded protein response process leads to the induction of ERS in Paneth cells. The ERS subsequently results in the induction of autophagy through three signaling pathways, including IRE1-JNK/NK-κB/XBP1, pancreatic ER kinase-eIF2d-activated transcription factor 4, and GRP78-activated transcription factor 6-CHOP signaling pathways. The induction of autophagy thus reduces the over-triggering of the ERS. In addition, the mitochondrial dysfunction triggers the accumulation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) in Paneth cells. The triggering ROS largely induces autophagy process through the p53-TIGAR/damage-regulated autophagy modulator, p62-NF-E2-related factor 2, as well as BINP3 pathways, thus fighting against cellular damage under stresses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wells JM, Rossi O, Meijerink M, van Baarlen P. Epithelial crosstalk at the microbiota-mucosal interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2011) 108:4607–14.10.1073/pnas.1000092107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goto Y, Kiyono H. Epithelial barrier: an interface for the cross-communication between gut flora and immune system. Immunol Rev (2012) 245:147–63.10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01078.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaser A, Zeissig S, Blumberg RS. Inflammatory bowel disease. Annu Rev Immunol (2010) 28:573–621.10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101225 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garrett WS, Gordon JI, Glimcher LH. Homeostasis and inflammation in the intestine. Cell (2010) 140:859–70.10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chow J, Lee SM, Shen Y, Khosravi A, Mazmanian SK. Host-bacterial symbiosis in health and disease. Mucosal Immun (2010) 107:243–74.10.1016/B978-0-12-381300-8.00008-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources