Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e019206.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019206.

Parents' uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Parents' uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Peter A Newman et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine factors associated with parents' uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines for their children.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: Cochrane Library, AIDSLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Social Sciences Abstracts, Ovid MEDLINE, Scholars Portal, Social Sciences Citation Index and Dissertation Abstracts International from inception through November 2017.

Methods: We included studies that sampled parents and assessed uptake of HPV vaccines for their children (≤18 years) and/or sociodemographics, knowledge, attitudes or other factors associated with uptake. Study risk of bias was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. We pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis and conducted moderation analyses to examine variance in uptake by sex of child and parent.

Results: Seventy-nine studies on 840 838 parents across 15 countries were included. The pooled proportion of parents' uptake of HPV vaccines for their children was 41.5% (range: 0.7%-92.8%), twofold higher for girls (46.5%) than for boys (20.3%). In the meta-analysis of 62 studies, physician recommendation (r=0.46 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.56)) had the greatest influence on parents' uptake, followed by HPV vaccine safety concerns (r=-0.31 (95% CI -0.41 to -0.16)), routine child preventive check-up, past 12 months (r=0.22 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.33)) and parents' belief in vaccines (r=0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.29)). Health insurance-covered HPV vaccination (r=0.16 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.29)) and lower out-of-pocket cost (r=-0.15 (95% CI -0.22 to -0.07)) had significant effects on uptake. We found significant moderator effects for sex of child.

Conclusions: Findings indicate suboptimal levels of HPV vaccine uptake, twofold lower among boys, that may be improved by increasing physician recommendations, addressing parental safety concerns and promoting parents' positive beliefs about vaccines, in addition to expanding insurance coverage and reducing out-of-pocket costs. Limitations of this meta-analysis include the lack of intervention studies and high risk of bias in most studies reviewed. Further studies should disaggregate HPV vaccine uptake by sex of child and parent.

Keywords: hpv vaccination; preventive medicine; public health; social medicine; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of the searched, identified and included studies of parents’ uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for their children. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

References

    1. Saraiya M, Unger ER, Thompson TD, et al. . US assessment of HPV types in cancers: implications for current and 9-valent HPV vaccines. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2015;107:djv086 10.1093/jnci/djv086 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrosky E, Bocchini JA, Jr, Hariri S, et al. . Use of 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: updated HPV vaccination recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64:300–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drolet M, Bénard Élodie, Boily M-C, et al. . Population-level impact and herd effects following human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15:565–80. 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71073-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. Immunization Coverage. Fact Sheet. 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs378/en/ (accessed 5 Jan 2018).
    1. Brotherton JML, Zuber PLF, Bloem PJN. Primary prevention of HPV through vaccination: update on the current global status. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 2016;5:210–24. 10.1007/s13669-016-0165-z - DOI

Publication types

Substances

Grants and funding