Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 20;8(1):6325.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24449-1.

Flux-tunable heat sink for quantum electric circuits

Affiliations

Flux-tunable heat sink for quantum electric circuits

M Partanen et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Superconducting microwave circuits show great potential for practical quantum technological applications such as quantum information processing. However, fast and on-demand initialization of the quantum degrees of freedom in these devices remains a challenge. Here, we experimentally implement a tunable heat sink that is potentially suitable for the initialization of superconducting qubits. Our device consists of two coupled resonators. The first resonator has a high quality factor and a fixed frequency whereas the second resonator is designed to have a low quality factor and a tunable resonance frequency. We engineer the low quality factor using an on-chip resistor and the frequency tunability using a superconducting quantum interference device. When the two resonators are in resonance, the photons in the high-quality resonator can be efficiently dissipated. We show that the corresponding loaded quality factor can be tuned from above 105 down to a few thousand at 10 GHz in good quantitative agreement with our theoretical model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample structure. (a) Optical top image of the measured sample. (b) False-colour scanning electron microscope image of the coupling capacitor between the two resonators, and (c) between Resonator 1 (light blue) and the port to the external transmission line (dark blue). (d) Two micrographs of the SQUID loop highlighted in blue and the junctions highlighted in red. (e) Two micrographs of the termination Cu resistor (red). (f) Electrical circuit diagram of the sample. Resonators 1 and 2 with characteristic impedances Z0 are coupled to each other by a coupling capacitance CT and to external transmission lines with characteristic impedance ZL by capacitances CC. The inductance of the SQUID is denoted by L, and the termination resistance by R. The SQUID is connected to the centre conductor of Resonator 2 line with capacitances CL, and the resistor to centre conductor and ground with CR1 and CR2, respectively. The lengths of the resonator sections are denoted by x1/2. The image in panel (a) is from Sample A, and those in panels (b)–(e) from Sample B.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Resonances of Sample A. (a,b) Experimental and (c,d) computational (a,c) amplitude and (b,d) phase of the scattering parameter S21 for the first four modes of Resonator 1 as functions of frequency and magnetic flux. The amplitude of S21 in each subpanel is normalized independently by dividing with the corresponding maximum amplitude. The power in the measurements is approximately −90 dBm at Port 1. The resonance frequencies at half flux quantum are given above the panels, and the simulation parameters are given in Table 1. The measured mode 1 has a lower signal-to-noise ratio compared to the other modes due to unintentional loss near 2.5 GHz in the measurement setup.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quality factors of Resonator 1 and resonances of Resonator 2 for Sample A. (a) Measured loaded quality factor, QL, for mode 2 (blue circles) and for mode 4 (red squares) as functions of the magnetic flux through the SQUID together with the simulated values (dashed line and dash-dotted line, respectively). (b) Absolute value of the simulated scattering parameter S21 of Sample A with only Resonator 2, i.e., at the limit CC → ∞. The colour bar is truncated at 0.999 for clarity. (c) Measured loaded quality factor, QL, of Sample A (markers) for the first four modes as functions of power at Port 1. (d) Measured QL of Sample A (circles), predicted external quality factor, Qext, (squares) and calculated internal quality factor, Qint, (triangles) as functions of the mode number. The simulation parameters are given in Table 1. In (a), the power at Port 1 is approximately −90 dBm, and in (d) −85 dBm. In (c) and (d), the magnetic flux through the SQUID is Φ/Φ0 = 0.5.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of the termination resistance. Simulated (a) amplitude, and (b) phase of mode 4 in Sample A as functions of frequency and magnetic flux with different resistance values, R, as indicated above the panels. The resonance frequency is f4 = 9.9 GHz, and the other parameters are given in Table 1.

References

    1. Ladd TD, et al. Quantum computers. Nature. 2010;464:45–53. doi: 10.1038/nature08812. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clarke J, Wilhelm FK. Superconducting quantum bits. Nature. 2008;453:1031–1042. doi: 10.1038/nature07128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blais A, Huang R-S, Wallraff A, Girvin SM, Schoelkopf RJ. Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A. 2004;69:062320. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320. - DOI
    1. Wallraff A, et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature. 2004;431:162–167. doi: 10.1038/nature02851. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Göppl M, et al. Coplanar waveguide resonators for circuit quantum electrodynamics. J. Appl. Phys. 2008;104:113904. doi: 10.1063/1.3010859. - DOI