Outcomes following surgery in subgroups of comatose and very elderly patients with chronic subdural hematoma
- PMID: 29679178
- PMCID: PMC6502770
- DOI: 10.1007/s10143-018-0979-4
Outcomes following surgery in subgroups of comatose and very elderly patients with chronic subdural hematoma
Abstract
Increasing age and lower pre-operative Glasgow coma score (GCS) are associated with worse outcome after surgery for chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). Only few studies have quantified outcomes specific to the very elderly or comatose patients. We aim to examine surgical outcomes in these patient groups. We analysed data from a prospective multicentre cohort study, assessing the risk of recurrence, death, and unfavourable functional outcome of very elderly (≥ 90 years) patients and comatose (pre-operative GCS ≤ 8) patients following surgical treatment of CSDH. Seven hundred eighty-five patients were included in the study. Thirty-two (4.1%) patients had pre-operative GCS ≤ 8 and 70 (8.9%) patients were aged ≥ 90 years. A higher proportion of comatose patients had an unfavourable functional outcome (38.7 vs 21.7%; p = 0.03), although similar proportion of comatose (64.5%) and non-comatose patients (61.8%) functionally improved after surgery (p = 0.96). Compared to patients aged < 90 years, a higher proportion of patients aged ≥ 90 years had unfavourable functional outcome (41.2 vs 20.5%; p < 0.01), although approximately half had functional improvement following surgery. Mortality risk was higher in both comatose (6.3 vs 1.9%; p = 0.05) and very elderly (8.8 vs 1.1%; p < 0.01) groups. There was a trend towards a higher recurrence risk in the comatose group (19.4 vs 9.5%; p = 0.07). Surgery can still provide considerable benefit to very elderly and comatose patients despite their higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Further research would be needed to better identify those most likely to benefit from surgery in these groups.
Keywords: Chronic subdural hematoma; Comatose; Outcome; Surgery; Very elderly.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval is not applicable as this study is the analysis of patient subgroups from a previously published study. The Academic Committee of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) approved the protocol of the original study. The original study was supported by the SBNS and formed part of the Neurosurgical National Audit Program.
References
-
- Karibe H, Kameyama M, Kawase M, Hirano T, Kawaguchi T, Tominaga T. Epidemiology of chronic subdural hematomas. No Shinkei Geka. 2011;39:1149–1153. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- II-C5-0715-20005/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- 12/35/57/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- G1002277/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- HTA/13/15/02/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- 602150/European Union Seventh Framework Program
- NIHR-RP-R3-12-013/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom
- G0502030/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- G9439390/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/L010305/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- G0601025/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- G0600986/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
