Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):45-51.
doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_136_17.

Equivalency of In vitro fertilization Success Rates in Elective Single Blastocyst Transfer and Elective Double Blastocyst Transfer: An Example of Equivalence Methodology in Clinical Reproductive Health

Marni B Jacobs  1 , Hillary Klonoff-Cohen  2 , V Gabriel Garzo  3
Affiliations

Equivalency of In vitro fertilization Success Rates in Elective Single Blastocyst Transfer and Elective Double Blastocyst Transfer: An Example of Equivalence Methodology in Clinical Reproductive Health

Marni B Jacobs et al. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Context: When comparing success rates between treatments, it is more appropriate to structure analyses in terms of equivalence rather than traditional analyses that assess differences. Unfortunately, no studies of elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT) have been conducted in this manner.

Aims: The objective of this study was to assess clinical equivalence of in vitro fertilization success rates among patients undergoing eSBT.

Settings and design: A historical prospective study was conducted at a private fertility center.

Methods: Medical records were reviewed to identify patients eligible for eSBT. Equivalency of success rates, defined as no more than a 10% difference based on 95% confidence intervals (CIs), was compared between eSBT (n = 125) and eDBT (n = 213) groups.

Results: Using traditional analysis techniques, no differences in pregnancy or live-birth rates were seen (eSBT: 84.6% vs. eDBT: 84.5%, P = 0.99; eSBT: 65.3% vs. eDBT: 72.3%, P = 0.23). The 95% CI around the difference in pregnancy rates ranged from -7.9 to 8.1, suggesting clinically equivalent pregnancy rates. Clinical equivalence was not established for live-births (95% CI = -18.5-4.5).

Conclusions: Findings suggest comparable pregnancy rates can be achieved in a clinical setting when utilizing eSBT in good-prognosis patients. Although live-birth rate equivalence was not demonstrated, it is thought the additional complications associated with multiple gestations outweigh the potentially higher live-birth rate. The present study highlights the importance of utilizing equivalence analyses when making statements regarding the similarity of two treatments in reproductive health, rather than relying on superiority analyses alone.

Keywords: Clinical equivalence; elective double blastocyst transfer; elective single blastocyst transfer; in vitro fertilization success rates; superiority analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2012 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Editor. Atlanta: CDC; 2014.
    1. Joint Sogc-Cfas Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee; Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee. Min JK, Hughes E, Young D. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–77. - PubMed
    1. Criniti A, Thyer A, Chow G, Lin P, Klein N, Soules M, et al. Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1613–9. - PubMed
    1. Friedman BE, Davis LB, Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Baker VL, Milki AA, et al. Age-related success with elective single versus double blastocyst transfer. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011. 2011:656204. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources