Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan;68(1):109-118.
doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.17084. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

Florigen and anti-florigen: flowering regulation in horticultural crops

Affiliations
Review

Florigen and anti-florigen: flowering regulation in horticultural crops

Yohei Higuchi. Breed Sci. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Flowering time regulation has significant effects on the agricultural and horticultural industries. Plants respond to changing environments and produce appropriate floral inducers (florigens) or inhibitors (anti-florigens) that determine flowering time. Recent studies have demonstrated that members of two homologous proteins, FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1), act as florigen and anti-florigen, respectively. Studies in diverse plant species have revealed universal but diverse roles of the FT/TFL1 gene family in many developmental processes. Recent studies in several crop species have revealed that modification of flowering responses, either due to mutations in the florigen/anti-florigen gene itself, or by modulation of the regulatory pathway, is crucial for crop domestication. The FT/TFL1 gene family could be an important potential breeding target in many crop species.

Keywords: FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT); TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1); anti-florigen; chrysanthemum; florigen; photoperiod.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowering time regulation by florigen and anti-florigen in Arabidopsis, rice, sugar beet, and chrysanthemums. The blue (solid) circles indicate systemic floral inducers, while red (dotted) circles indicate systemic floral inhibitors. TFL1 homologs suppress flowering at the shoot apex.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Photoperiodic regulation of flowering in chrysanthemums. (A) Over-expression of AFT in Chrysanthemum morifolium results in extremely late flowering under short day (SD) photoperiod. (B) Under SD, FTL3 is produced in leaves to systemically induce flowering. Under non-inductive long day (LD) or night-break (NB), AFT is induced in leaves to systemically inhibit flowering. The red light signal perceived by phyB induces AFT but suppresses FTL3 expression. Induction of AFT by phyB is gated by the circadian clock. TFL1 acts as a constitutive local repressor of flowering. (C) Model for induction of AFT under LD, SD, and NB conditions. The gate for AFT induction opens at a constant time after dusk regardless of the photoperiod. Under LD, the photo-sensitive phase (dotted line) of AFT interacts with red light in the morning and induces AFT expression (solid line) to inhibit flowering. Under NB, illumination at midnight coincides with the photo-sensitive phase of AFT.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The model for flowering time regulation in two major horticultural crops. (A) Flowering regulation in tomato. In wild species, a systemic anti-florigen SP5G is induced under long days (LD) to inhibit flowering. In day neutral (DN) domesticated species, the induction pathway of SP5G is attenuated. (B) Flowering regulation in wild strawberry (F. vesca). In seasonal flowering of short day (SD) cultivars, a strong floral repressor TFL1 suppresses flowering under LD. In perpetual flowering cultivars in which repressor activity of TFL1 is absent, FT1 and SOC1, act to promote flowering under LD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abe, M., Kobayashi, Y., Yamamoto, S., Daimon, Y., Yamaguchi, A., Ikeda, Y., Ichinoki, H., Notaguchi, M., Goto, K. and Araki, T. (2005) FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 309: 1052–1056. - PubMed
    1. Abelenda, J.A., Cruz-Oró, E., Franco-Zorrilla, J.M. and Prat, S. (2016) Potato StCONSTANS-like1 suppresses storage organ formation by directly activating the FT-like StSP5G repressor. Curr. Biol. 26: 872–881. - PubMed
    1. Ahn, J.H., Miller, D., Winter, V.J., Banfield, M.J., Lee, J.H., Yoo, S.Y., Henz, S.R., Brady, R.L. and Weigel, D. (2006) A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO J. 25: 605–614. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackman, B.K., Strasburg, J.L., Raduski, A.R., Michaels, S.D. and Rieseberg, L.H. (2010) The role of recently derived FT paralogs in sunflower domestication. Curr. Biol. 20: 629–635. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley, D., Ratcliffe, O., Vincent, C., Carpenter, R. and Coen, E. (1997) Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275: 80–83. - PubMed