Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 13;6(1):e000456.
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000456. eCollection 2018.

Metformin in gestational diabetes: the offspring follow-up (MiG TOFU): body composition and metabolic outcomes at 7-9 years of age

Janet A Rowan  1 , Elaine C Rush  2 , Lindsay D Plank  3 , Jun Lu  2 , Victor Obolonkin  2 , Suzette Coat  4 , William M Hague  4   5
Affiliations

Metformin in gestational diabetes: the offspring follow-up (MiG TOFU): body composition and metabolic outcomes at 7-9 years of age

Janet A Rowan et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare body composition and metabolic outcomes at 7-9 years in offspring of women with gestational diabetes (GDM) randomized to metformin (±insulin) or insulin treatment during pregnancy.

Research design and methods: Children were assessed at 7 years in Adelaide (n=109/181) and 9 years in Auckland (n=99/396) by anthropometry, bioimpedance analysis (BIA), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n=92/99) and fasting bloods (n=82/99).

Results: In the Adelaide subgroup, mothers were similar at enrollment. Women randomized to metformin versus insulin had higher treatment glycemia (p=0.002) and more infants with birth weight >90th percentile (20.7% vs 5.9%; p=0.029). At 7 years, there were no differences in offspring measures. In Auckland, at enrollment, women randomized to metformin had a higher body mass index (BMI) (p=0.08) but gained less weight during treatment (p=0.07). Offspring birth measures were similar. At 9 years, metformin offspring were larger by measures of weight, arm and waist circumferences, waist:height (p<0.05); BMI, triceps skinfold (p=0.05); DXA fat mass and lean mass (p=0.07); MRI abdominal fat volume (p=0.051). Body fat percent was similar between treatment groups by DXA and BIA. Abdominal fat percentages (visceral adipose tissue, subcutaneous adipose tissue and liver) were similar by MRI. Fasting glucose, triglyceride, insulin, insulin resistance, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), cholesterol, liver transaminases, leptin and adiponectin were similar.

Conclusions: Metformin or insulin for GDM was associated with similar offspring total and abdominal body fat percent and metabolic measures at 7-9 years. Metformin-exposed children were larger at 9 years. Metformin may interact with fetal environmental factors to influence offspring outcomes.

Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus; insulin; metformin; offspring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, et al. . Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2003–15. 10.1056/NEJMoa0707193 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balsells M, García-Patterson A, Solà I, et al. . Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015;350:h102 10.1136/bmj.h102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li G, Zhao S, Cui S, et al. . Effect comparison of metformin with insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis based on RCTs. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;292:111–20. 10.1007/s00404-014-3566-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao LP, Sheng XY, Zhou S, et al. . Metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015;80:1224–34. 10.1111/bcp.12672 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butalia S, Gutierrez L, Lodha A, et al. . Short- and long-term outcomes of metformin compared with insulin alone in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2017;34:27–36. 10.1111/dme.13150 - DOI - PubMed