How measurement science can improve confidence in research results
- PMID: 29684013
- PMCID: PMC5933802
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004299
How measurement science can improve confidence in research results
Abstract
The current push for rigor and reproducibility is driven by a desire for confidence in research results. Here, we suggest a framework for a systematic process, based on consensus principles of measurement science, to guide researchers and reviewers in assessing, documenting, and mitigating the sources of uncertainty in a study. All study results have associated ambiguities that are not always clarified by simply establishing reproducibility. By explicitly considering sources of uncertainty, noting aspects of the experimental system that are difficult to characterize quantitatively, and proposing alternative interpretations, the researcher provides information that enhances comparability and reproducibility.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Begley C. G. & Ellis L. M. Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 2012;483(7391): 531–533 doi: 10.1038/483531a - DOI - PubMed
-
- Prinz F., Schlange T. & Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011;10(9): 712, doi: 10.1038/nrd3439-c1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Peng R. D. Reproducible research in computational science. Science 2011;334(6060): 1226–1227, doi: 10.1126/science.1213847 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Report No. 978-0-309-13130-8 (Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council, 2009).
-
- Ioannidis J. P. et al. A network of investigator networks in human genome epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162(4): 302–304, doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi201 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
