Testing the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain
- PMID: 29684014
- PMCID: PMC5912744
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194358
Testing the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain
Abstract
Introduction: Neuropathic pain (NP) can cause substantial suffering and, therefore, it must be diagnosed and treated promptly. Diagnosis of NP can be difficult and if made by an expert pain physician is considered the gold standard, however where expert help may not be easily available, screening tools for NP can be used. The painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) is a simple screening tool and has been widely used in several languages. We developed an Arabic version of PD-Q and tested its validity and reliability.
Methods: The original PD-Q was translated into the Arabic language by a team of experts. The translated version of the PD-Q was administered to the study population, which included patients having moderate to severe pain for at least three months. Reliability of the Arabic version was evaluated by an intra-class-correlation coefficient (ICC) between pre- and post-measures and Cronbach's α values. Validity was measured by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Expert pain physician diagnosis was considered as the gold standard for comparing the diagnostic accuracy.
Results: A total of 375 patients were included in the study, of which 153 (40.8%) patients were diagnosed with NP and 222 [59.2%] patients had nociceptive pain. The ICC between pre- and post-PD-Q scale total scores for the overall sample, NP group, and NocP group was 0.970 (95% CI, 0.964-0.976), 0.963 (95% CI, 0.949-0.973), and 0.962 (95% CI, 0.951-0.971), respectively. The Cronbach's α values for the post-assessment measures in the overall sample, NP group, and nociceptive pain group, were 0.764, 0.684, and 0.746, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.775 (95% CI, 0.725-0.825) for the PD-Q total score.
Conclusion: The Arabic version of the PD-Q showed good reliability and validity in the detection of NP component in patients with chronic pain.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Validity and reliability of Arabic version of the ID Pain screening questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0192307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192307. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29543831 Free PMC article.
-
Turkish version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain: a validity and reliability study.Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14(12):1933-43. doi: 10.1111/pme.12222. Epub 2013 Aug 7. Pain Med. 2013. PMID: 23924395
-
Validation of a New Arabic Version of the Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4).Pain Pract. 2017 Jan;17(1):78-87. doi: 10.1111/papr.12419. Epub 2016 Feb 20. Pain Pract. 2017. PMID: 26895970
-
The painDETECT project - far more than a screening tool on neuropathic pain.Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Jun;32(6):1033-57. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1157460. Epub 2016 Mar 11. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016. PMID: 26907456 Review.
-
Diagnostic Methods for Neuropathic Pain: A Review of Diagnostic Accuracy [Internet].Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2015 Apr 7. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2015 Apr 7. PMID: 26180859 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Does the painDETECT questionnaire identify impaired conditioned pain modulation in people with musculoskeletal pain? - a diagnostic accuracy study.Arch Physiother. 2023 Sep 18;13(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40945-023-00171-8. Arch Physiother. 2023. PMID: 37723541 Free PMC article.
-
Possible Neuropathic Pain in Clinical Practice-Review on Selected Diagnostic Tools and Its Further Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):108. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010108. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36611400 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Initial researches on neuro-functional status and evolution in chronic ethanol consumers with recent traumatic spinal cord injury.J Med Life. 2019 Apr-Jun;12(2):97-112. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0026. J Med Life. 2019. PMID: 31406510 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the painDETECT to discriminate musculoskeletal pain phenotypes.Arch Physiother. 2022 Feb 17;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00129-2. Arch Physiother. 2022. PMID: 35172904 Free PMC article.
References
-
- IASP. IASP taxonomy. 2012; https://www.iasp-pain.org/Taxonomy#Pain Accessed on 23 October 2017.
-
- Jensen TS, Baron R, Haanpää M, Kalso E, Loeser JD, Rice AS, et al. A new definition of neuropathic pain. Pain. 2011. October;152(10):2204–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.017 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, Cruccu G, Dostrovsky JO, Griffin JW, et al. Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology. 2008. April 29;70(18):1630–5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000282763.29778.59 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Freynhagen R, Tölle TR, Gockel U, Baron R. The painDETECT project—far more than a screening tool on neuropathic pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016. June;32(6):1033–57. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1157460 - DOI - PubMed
-
- de Barros GAM, Colhado OCG, Giublin ML. Clinical presentation and diagnosis of neuropathic pain. Rev Dor. São Paulo, 2016;17(Suppl 1): S15–9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous