Low-power versus medium-power toric intraocular lenses in cataract surgery, about 110 eyes
- PMID: 29685737
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.12.006
Low-power versus medium-power toric intraocular lenses in cataract surgery, about 110 eyes
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the refractive predictability of low-power and medium-power toric intraocular lenses (IOL) during cataract surgery.
Methods: A retrospective case series. Patients with low and moderate degrees of astigmatism were treated with either an Alcon AcrySof IQ toric monofocal lens (SN6AT2 or SN6AT3) or a Zeiss toric monofocal lens (709 MP + 1 D or 709 MP + 1.5 D). They were divided into two groups: group 1 with low-power toric IOL (n = 40, SN6AT2 and 709 MP + 1), group 2 with medium-power toric IOL (n = 70, SN6AT3 and 709 MP + 1.5 D). Eyes were evaluated before and 1 month after surgery. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corneal and total astigmatism were compared pre- and postoperatively. Vector astigmatism analysis was evaluated using the Alpins method. IOL alignment was checked postoperatively at slit lamp under pupil dilatation and on photos using Eyesuite® software (Luneau®).
Results: More than three-quarters of the patients in each group attained a visual acuity of at least 0.1 LogMAR (0.8) without spectacles. The reduction of total astigmatism was significant in the two groups. The residual refractive astigmatism did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.64) and was less than 0.4 D. More than 80% of patients (82.5 vs 84.3%) presented a postoperative refractive spherical equivalent at ±0.50 D (P = 0.8). Vectorial astigmatism was significantly different in the two groups (0.43 D in group 1, vs 0.27 D in group 2; P = 0.03).
Conclusion: This is the first study comparing the low- versus medium-power toric IOLs, the most widely used. This study suggests very good refractive results both with low- and medium-power toric IOLs with a single surgical procedure.
Keywords: Acuité visuelle sans correction; Astigmatism; Astigmatisme; Chirurgie de cataracte réfractive; Implant toric; Refractive cataract surgery; Toric IOL; Uncorrected visual acuity.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Rotational performance and corneal astigmatism correction during cataract surgery: aspheric toric intraocular lens versus aspheric nontoric intraocular lens with opposite clear corneal incision.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Aug;40(8):1355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.11.039. Epub 2014 Jul 1. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014. PMID: 24996893 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate different intraocular lenses for the surgical compensation of low to moderate-to-high regular corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;41(12):2683-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.036. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015. PMID: 26796449 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of visual outcomes for aspheric and spherical toric intraocular lens implantation in cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism: a randomized control trial.J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Nov;97 Suppl 11:S102-10. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014. PMID: 25509703 Clinical Trial.
-
Toric intraocular lens versus limbal relaxing incisions for corneal astigmatism after phacoemulsification.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 17;12(12):CD012801. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012801.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31845757 Free PMC article.
-
Femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomy versus toric IOL implantation for correcting astigmatism in cataract patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Br J Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 24;109(3):324-332. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2024-325195. Br J Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 38575199
Cited by
-
Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation-A Case Series of 60 Eyes.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 14;10(9):1773. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091773. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36141385 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources