Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug 6;217(8):2615-2631.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201708075. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

Posttranscriptional regulation of T helper cell fate decisions

Affiliations
Review

Posttranscriptional regulation of T helper cell fate decisions

Kai P Hoefig et al. J Cell Biol. .

Abstract

T helper cell subsets orchestrate context- and pathogen-specific responses of the immune system. They mostly do so by secreting specific cytokines that attract or induce activation and differentiation of other immune or nonimmune cells. The differentiation of T helper 1 (Th1), Th2, T follicular helper, Th17, and induced regulatory T cell subsets from naive T cells depends on the activation of intracellular signal transduction cascades. These cascades originate from T cell receptor and costimulatory receptor engagement and also receive critical input from cytokine receptors that sample the cytokine milieu within secondary lymphoid organs. Signal transduction then leads to the expression of subset-specifying transcription factors that, in concert with other transcription factors, up-regulate downstream signature genes. Although regulation of transcription is important, recent research has shown that posttranscriptional and posttranslational regulation can critically shape or even determine the outcome of Th cell differentiation. In this review, we describe how specific microRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, RNA-binding proteins, and ubiquitin-modifying enzymes regulate their targets to skew cell fate decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Regulatory processes during Th1 differentiation. Noncoding RNAs, RBPs, and E3 ligases/DUBs are shown in blue, red, and green, respectively. For clarity of depiction, these posttranscriptional regulators were not necessarily placed at the correct cellular site of activity. Dashed lines indicate an indirect effect. Molecular interactions are explained in the text.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Regulatory processes during Th2 differentiation. Noncoding RNAs, RBPs, and E3 ligases/DUBs are shown in blue, red, and green, respectively. For clarity of depiction, these posttranscriptional regulators were not necessarily placed at the correct cellular site of activity. Molecular interactions are explained in the text.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Regulatory processes during Tfh differentiation. Noncoding RNAs, RBPs, and E3 ligases/DUBs are shown in blue, red, and green, respectively. For clarity of depiction, these posttranscriptional regulators were not necessarily placed at the correct cellular site of activity. Dashed lines indicate indirect effects. Molecular interactions are explained in the text.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Regulatory processes during Th17 differentiation. Noncoding RNAs, RBPs, and E3 ligases/DUBs are shown in blue, red, and green, respectively. For clarity of depiction, these posttranscriptional regulators were not necessarily placed at the correct cellular site of activity. Dashed lines indicate a suspected effect. Molecular interactions are explained in the text.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Regulatory processes during iTreg cell differentiation. Noncoding RNAs, RBPs, and E3 ligases/DUBs are shown in blue, red, and green, respectively. For clarity of depiction, these posttranscriptional regulators were not necessarily placed at the correct cellular site of activity. Dashed lines indicate an indirect effect. Molecular interactions are explained in the text.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acuto O., and Michel F.. 2003. CD28-mediated co-stimulation: A quantitative support for TCR signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:939–951. 10.1038/nri1248 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akira S. 2013. Regnase-1, a ribonuclease involved in the regulation of immune responses. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 78:51–60. 10.1101/sqb.2013.78.019877 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altman A., and Villalba M.. 2003. Protein kinase C-theta (PKCtheta): It’s all about location, location, location. Immunol. Rev. 192:53–63. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2003.00027.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amodio N., Rossi M., Raimondi L., Pitari M.R., Botta C., Tagliaferri P., and Tassone P.. 2015. miR-29s: A family of epi-miRNAs with therapeutic implications in hematologic malignancies. Oncotarget. 6:12837–12861. 10.18632/oncotarget.3805 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annemann M., Wang Z., Plaza-Sirvent C., Glauben R., Schuster M., Ewald Sander F., Mamareli P., Kühl A.A., Siegmund B., Lochner M., and Schmitz I.. 2015. IκBNS regulates murine Th17 differentiation during gut inflammation and infection. J. Immunol. 194:2888–2898. 10.4049/jimmunol.1401964 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources