International Medical Graduates in the US Physician Workforce and Graduate Medical Education: Current and Historical Trends
- PMID: 29686763
- PMCID: PMC5901803
- DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00580.1
International Medical Graduates in the US Physician Workforce and Graduate Medical Education: Current and Historical Trends
Abstract
Background: Data show that international medical graduates (IMGs), both US and foreign born, are more likely to enter primary care specialties and practice in underserved areas. Comprehensive assessments of representation trends for IMGs in the US physician workforce are limited.
Objective: We reported current and historical representation trends for IMGs in the graduate medical education (GME) training pool and US practicing physician workforce.
Methods: We compared representation for the total GME and active practicing physician pools with the 20 largest residency specialties. A 2-sided test was used for comparison, with P < .001 considered significant. To assess significant increases in IMG GME trainee representation for the total pool and each of the specialties from 1990-2015, the slope was estimated using simple linear regression.
Results: IMGs showed significantly greater representation among active practicing physicians in 4 specialties: internal medicine (39%), neurology (31%), psychiatry (30%), and pediatrics (25%). IMGs in GME showed significantly greater representation in 5 specialties: pathology (39%), internal medicine (39%), neurology (36%), family medicine (32%), and psychiatry (31%; all P < .001). Over the past quarter century, IMG representation in GME has increased by 0.2% per year in the total GME pool, and 1.1% per year for family medicine, 0.5% for obstetrics and gynecology and general surgery, and 0.3% for internal medicine.
Conclusions: IMGs make up nearly a quarter of the total GME pool and practicing physician workforce, with a disproportionate share, and larger increases over our study period in certain specialties.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Pinsky WW. The importance of international medical graduates in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2017; 166 11: 840– 841. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong K., Anderson ME., Carethers JM., et al. International exchange and American medicine. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376 19: e40. - PubMed
-
- Jagsi R. From Muslim registries to radical health care reform—caring for patients in an era of political anxiety. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3 3: 303– 304. - PubMed
-
- Nabavizadeh N., Thomas CR., Jr. Impact of US immigration ban on oncologists and patients: oncology knows no borders. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3 5: 591. - PubMed
-
- Hallock JA., Seeling SS., Norcini JJ. The international medical graduate pipeline. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003; 22 4: 94– 96. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous