Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 2:7:e11.
doi: 10.1017/jns.2018.4. eCollection 2018.

Traditional methods v. new technologies - dilemmas for dietary assessment in large-scale nutrition surveys and studies: a report following an international panel discussion at the 9th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods (ICDAM9), Brisbane, 3 September 2015

Affiliations

Traditional methods v. new technologies - dilemmas for dietary assessment in large-scale nutrition surveys and studies: a report following an international panel discussion at the 9th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods (ICDAM9), Brisbane, 3 September 2015

B Amoutzopoulos et al. J Nutr Sci. .

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to summarise current and future applications of dietary assessment technologies in nutrition surveys in developed countries. It includes the discussion of key points and highlights of subsequent developments from a panel discussion to address strengths and weaknesses of traditional dietary assessment methods (food records, FFQ, 24 h recalls, diet history with interviewer-assisted data collection) v. new technology-based dietary assessment methods (web-based and mobile device applications). The panel discussion 'Traditional methods v. new technologies: dilemmas for dietary assessment in population surveys', was held at the 9th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods (ICDAM9), Brisbane, September 2015. Despite respondent and researcher burden, traditional methods have been most commonly used in nutrition surveys. However, dietary assessment technologies offer potential advantages including faster data processing and better data quality. This is a fast-moving field and there is evidence of increasing demand for the use of new technologies amongst the general public and researchers. There is a need for research and investment to support efforts being made to facilitate the inclusion of new technologies for rapid, accurate and representative data.

Keywords: AES, Australian Eating Survey; AHS, Australian Health Survey; AMPM, Automated Multiple-Pass Method; ASA24, Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall; DNFCS, Dutch National Food Consumption Survey; Dietary assessment technologies; ICDAM9, 9th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods; MRC, Medical Research Council; Mobile applications; NDNS, National Diet and Nutrition Survey; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; Nutrition surveys; RP, Rolling Programme; Web-based tools; WebDASC, Web-based Dietary Assessment Software for Children; mFR, mobile food record.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Long JD, Boswell C, Rogers TJ, et al. (2013) Effectiveness of cell phones and mypyramidtracker.gov to estimate fruit and vegetable intake. Appl Nurs Res 26, 17–23. - PubMed
    1. European Food Safety Authority (2014) Guidance on the EU menu methodology. EFSA J 12, 3944.
    1. Ahluwalia N, Dwyer J, Terry A, et al. (2016) Update on NHANES dietary data: focus on collection, release, analytical considerations, and uses to inform public policy. Adv Nutr 7, 121–134. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mensink GB, Haftenberger M & Thamm M (2001) Validity of DISHES 98, a computerised dietary history interview: energy and macronutrient intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 409–417. - PubMed
    1. Slimani N, Casagrande C, Nicolas G, et al. (2011) The standardized computerized 24-h dietary recall method EPIC-Soft adapted for pan-European dietary monitoring. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, Suppl. 1, S5–S15. - PubMed